Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:317125.
doi: 10.1155/2012/317125. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Effect of high-dose oral rabeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers

Affiliations

Effect of high-dose oral rabeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers

Hyung-Keun Kim et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012.

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of high-dose oral rabeprazole versus high-dose IV PPI on rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. Methods. This was a two-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with a high-risk bleeding peptic ulcer had endoscopic hemostasis and were randomly assigned to the high-dose oral rabeprazole group (20 mg twice daily for 72 hours) or the high-dose IV omeprazole group (80 mg as a bolus injection followed by continuous infusion at 8 mg/h for 72 hours). Results. The study was stopped because of slow enrollment (total n = 106). The rebleeding rates within 3 days were 3.7% (2 of 54 patients) given oral rabeprazole and 1.9% (1 of 52 patients) given IV omeprazole (P = 1.000). The rebleeding rates after 3 days were 1.9% and 0% (P = 1.000), respectively. The surgical intervention rates were 3.7% and 0% (P = 0.495), and the mortality rates were 1.9% and 0% (P = 1.000), respectively. Conclusions. The effect of high-dose oral rabeprazole did not differ significantly from that of high-dose IV omeprazole on rebleeding, surgical intervention, or mortality after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers, but this requires further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart. *For full details of patients who discontinued or dropped out, see Table 4.

References

    1. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: rselationship to sales of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002;97(10):2540–2549. - PubMed
    1. Jutabha R, Jensen D. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Friedman S, McQuaid K, Grendell J, editors. Current Diagnosis & Treatment in Gastroenterology. New York, NY, USA: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Divisionl; 2003. pp. 53–69.
    1. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1995;90(2):206–210. - PubMed
    1. van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EAJ, et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: Did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;98(7):1494–1499. - PubMed
    1. Rockall TA, Logan RFA, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal. 1995;311(6999):222–226. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources