Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990;100(2):145-50.
doi: 10.1007/BF02244397.

A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity

Affiliations

A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity

T V Jaeger et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990.

Abstract

A model of drug discrimination based on a lithium chloride (LiCl) flavour aversion was described and examined. Mildly thirsty rats were presented daily with 4 ml of a distinctly flavoured solution which was followed on 50% of the days by an IP injection of LiCl. Prior to the flavour presentation, the rats were injection SC with saline or a training drug (0.04 mg/kg fentanyl or 20 mg/kg pentobarbital) to signal whether LiCl would follow. Almost all rats eventually exhibited stable behaviour that involved drinking most or all of the fluid when it was not to be followed by LiCl and little or no drinking when it was. Such discrimination occurred regardless of whether drug predicted LiCl (learned-discomfort) or predicted no LiCl (learned-safety). However, with fentanyl there were clear differences between rats trained with drug under learned-safety and under learned-discomfort conditions for 1) the rate of acquisition of stable performance as a function of LiCl dose, 2) generalization of the training dose to a test dose that was lower, and 3) elicitation of fentanyl responses by pentobarbital. These findings, together with indications that such effects did not always occur with pentobarbital as the training drug, were discussed from theoretical and practical perspectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982 Jun;221(3):735-9 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(3):274-80 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Nov;211(2):401-8 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978 Dec;9(6):863-87 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res. 1986 Nov 12;397(2):214-24 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources