Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;4(5):465-6.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.08.16.

Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Omar Khan et al. J Thorac Dis. 2012 Oct.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bailey LA, Khan OA, Reddy M, et al. Does laparoscopic mobilisation of the stomach as part of a trans-thoracic oesophageal resection result in improved peri-operative outcomes as compared with an open approach? Int J Surg. 2012 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
    1. Pradhan C, Khan OA. Does thoracoscopic mobilisation of the oesophagus during oesophageal resection result in improved outcomes as compared to open thoracotomy? Int J Surg 2012;10:232-5 - PubMed
    1. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:413-24 - PubMed
    1. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-92 - PubMed
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-84 - PubMed