Monitoring of therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

Abstract

The monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) based on clinical symptoms and activity scores alone has major drawbacks. Despite clinical remission, in many patients with ongoing low-grade inflammation and activity scores, there is a tendency to underestimate IBD activity as parameters depend on the subjective symptoms of the patients. C-reactive protein might identify patients with low-grade inflammation, especially in Crohn's disease, but sensitivity remains limited. Recently, fecal markers of inflammation have been shown to correlate well with endoscopic disease activity and to predict relapse. However, data on serial measurements to guide therapy are scarce. The role of anti-TNF-α antibodies and plasma TNF-α concentrations in IBD therapy is currently unclear and needs to be defined further. The goal of improving disease outcome has not been demonstrated for any noninvasive biomarker so far.