Variability of organophosphorous pesticide metabolite levels in spot and 24-hr urine samples collected from young children during 1 week
- PMID: 23052012
- PMCID: PMC3553429
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104808
Variability of organophosphorous pesticide metabolite levels in spot and 24-hr urine samples collected from young children during 1 week
Abstract
Background: Dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolites in spot urine samples are frequently used to characterize children's exposures to organophosphorous (OP) pesticides. However, variable exposure and short biological half-lives of OP pesticides could result in highly variable measurements, leading to exposure misclassification.
Objective: We examined within- and between-child variability in DAP metabolites in urine samples collected during 1 week.
Methods: We collected spot urine samples over 7 consecutive days from 25 children (3-6 years of age). On two of the days, we collected 24-hr voids. We assessed the reproducibility of urinary DAP metabolite concentrations and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of spot urine samples as predictors of high (top 20%) or elevated (top 40%) weekly average DAP metabolite concentrations.
Results: Within-child variance exceeded between-child variance by a factor of two to eight, depending on metabolite grouping. Although total DAP concentrations in single spot urine samples were moderately to strongly associated with concentrations in same-day 24-hr samples (r ≈ 0.6-0.8, p < 0.01), concentrations in spot samples collected > 1 day apart and in 24-hr samples collected 3 days apart were weakly correlated (r ≈ -0.21 to 0.38). Single spot samples predicted high (top 20%) and elevated (top 40%) full-week average total DAP excretion with only moderate sensitivity (≈ 0.52 and ≈ 0.67, respectively) but relatively high specificity (≈ 0.88 and ≈ 0.78, respectively).
Conclusions: The high variability we observed in children's DAP metabolite concentrations suggests that single-day urine samples provide only a brief snapshot of exposure. Sensitivity analyses suggest that classification of cumulative OP exposure based on spot samples is prone to type 2 classification errors.
Conflict of interest statement
The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EPA or the NIEHS.
B.E. recently consulted on a pesticide exposure case. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Figures
References
-
- Aprea C, Colosio C, Mammone T, Minoia C, Maroni M. Biological monitoring of pesticide exposure: a review of analytical methods. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002;769(2):191–219. - PubMed
-
- Barr DB. Biomonitoring of exposure to pesticides. J Chem Health Saf. 2008;15(6):20–29.
-
- Boeniger MF, Lowry LK, Rosenberg J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993;54(10):615–627. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous