Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Jan;37(1):227-32.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1812-9.

Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Wen-Tao Zhao et al. World J Surg. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of the transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods: Between January 2007 and May 2011 a nonrandomized prospective study of patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer was done. The patients were divided into the transanal drainage tube (TDT) and non-transanal drainage tube (NTDT) groups according to whether the transanal drainage tube was used in the operation. Clinical characteristics and postoperative complications were compared between the TDT and NTDT groups.

Results: The study included 81 patients in the TDT group and 77 patients in the NTDT group. In the TDT group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients and no anastomotic bleeding occurred. In the NTDT group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 7 patients and anastomotic bleeding occurred in 2 patients. The TDT group had significantly fewer anastomotic complications compared with the NTDT group (2.5 vs 11.7 %; P = 0.029). Furthermore, the TDT group showed an obvious reduction in the rate of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding compared with the NTDT group (2.5 vs 7.8 % and 0.0 vs 2.6 %), but because the number of cases is relatively small, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.160 and P = 0.236).

Conclusions: The use of a transanal drainage tube in anterior resection for rectal cancer may be a simple, safe, and effective means of preventing or reducing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and bleeding. A larger-scale single or multi-center prospective randomized study or a meta-analysis including similar studies is necessary for further elucidation of this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tech Coloproctol. 2007 Mar;11(1):64-6 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):145-51 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):51-7 - PubMed
    1. Tech Coloproctol. 2010 Nov;14 Suppl 1:S35-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources