Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Feb;20(2):151-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0560-4.

Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections?

Affiliations
Review

Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections?

Gerard J Abood et al. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Minimally invasive liver surgery has recently undergone an explosion in reported worldwide experience. Given its comparable outcomes to its open counterpart, high-volume centers are utilizing minimal access liver surgery more frequently under well-defined criteria. The recent introduction of robot-assisted surgery has further revolutionized the field of minimally invasive surgery and has expanded the reach of feasibility. Robot-assisted surgery was developed to help overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. As a result, there has been an increase in the reporting of advanced robot-assisted liver resections. A literature review was performed to identify the current manuscripts describing robot-assisted liver surgery. Nine case series were identified, yielding 144 unique patient characteristics. Outcomes indicate that robot-assisted liver resection is feasible and safe for both minor and major liver resections with regard to estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complications. Early data also suggest that robot-assisted liver surgery is efficacious with regard to short-term oncologic outcomes. Future studies will be needed to better evaluate advantages and disadvantages compared to laparoscopic liver resections.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Muhe E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Z Gastroenterol Verh. 1991 Mar;26:204–6. - PubMed
    1. Wilhelm T, Metzig A. Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy (eMIT): a prospective proof-of-concept study in humans. World J Surg. Mar;35(3):543–51. - PubMed
    1. Atluri P, Woo YJ. Minimally invasive robotic mitral valve surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. Jan;8(1):115–20. - PubMed
    1. Martel G, Boushey RP. Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;86(4):867–97. - PubMed
    1. Levy RM, Wizorek J, Shende M, Luketich JD. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Adv Surg. 44:101–16. - PubMed