Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;28(4):477-84.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1580-x. Epub 2012 Sep 30.

Long-term fecal diverting device for the prevention of sepsis in case of colorectal anastomotic leakage: an animal experiment

Affiliations

Long-term fecal diverting device for the prevention of sepsis in case of colorectal anastomotic leakage: an animal experiment

Jae Hwang Kim et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A new fecal diverting device (FDD) was fabricated for fecal diversion from the proximal colon above the anastomosis to outside the anus for protecting the rectal anastomosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FDD.

Methods: After a pilot study, a prospective observational trial was performed in 34 mongrel dogs. The experiment comprised of segmental resection and anastomosis of the colon, fixation of the FDD, and observation for 3 weeks (n = 15) and more than 3 weeks (n = 19) without initiation of parenteral nutrition.

Results: Four cases of perioperative death unrelated to the FDD were excluded. Twenty-six (87 %) of the 30 dogs survived. Sixteen (53 %) dogs were able to retain the FDD for more than 3 weeks until 82 days. The autopsy findings revealed that four (15 %) dogs showed colonic wall erosions and mucosal scarring respectively at the band fixation area without evidence of serious septic complications. The surviving dogs retained the FDD for more than 6 days. Mortality occurred in four of the five dogs that expelled the FDD within three postoperative days. A closed abscess cavity as the evidence of anastomotic leakage was noted in seven (23 %) of the surviving dogs.

Conclusions: The newly designed fecal diverting device can be retained for more than 3 weeks until 82 days without any serious complications. The FDD may prevent sepsis in case of anastomotic leakage if it is retained for more than 6 days.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic drawing and photograph of the fecal diverting device
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The FDD (fecal diverting device) is fixed by a mesh band at 5–10 cm proximal to the anastomotic site
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart of the dogs included in this study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bowel wall erosion (a) and linear mucosal scarring (b) developed at the FDD (fecal diverting device) fixation area. a Macroscopic findings of the sectioned colonic segment containing the band fixation area and anastomotic ring; partially penetrated mesh band material is noted on the mucosal surface. a’ Microscopic findings of the sectioned bowel wall containing the mesh band material during the process of erosion; Cross sections of the bundles of mesh bands are noted in the submucosa. They are surrounded by dense fibrosis rather than acute inflammation. H&E, ×100. b Macroscopic findings of the sectioned bowel lumen at the band fixation area; A transverse linear scar is noted along the placement of mesh band. b’ Microscopic findings of the sectioned bowel wall at the band fixation area; Surface mucosa is ulcerated (arrow). Underlying submucosa and muscular layer are replaced by fibrosis (asterisk). H&E, ×40

References

    1. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1973;60:461–464. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD001544. - PubMed
    1. Wong NY, Eu KW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2076–2079. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0146-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I. Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;5:CD006878. - PubMed
    1. Ravo B, Ger R. A preliminary report on the intracolonic bypass as an alternative to a temporary colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;159:541–545. - PubMed

Publication types