Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;58(3):824-34.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2412-0. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Non-adherence and graft failure in adult liver transplant recipients

Affiliations

Non-adherence and graft failure in adult liver transplant recipients

Sarah R Lieber et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence to medical therapy after liver transplantation is confounded by different methods of measurement.

Aims: (1) To compare the performance of three different methods of measuring non-adherence: (a) biochemical (standard deviation [SD] tacrolimus levels), (b) clinician report, (c) self-report. (2) To identify pre-transplant predictors of post-transplant non-adherence. (3) To evaluate whether SD tacrolimus is an accurate predictor of graft outcomes.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, charts of adult recipients of a liver transplant 2003-2009 (sample A, n = 444) were reviewed to determine pre-transplant predictors of non-adherence and clinician report of non-adherence. SD tacrolimus levels were measured between 6 and 18 months post-transplant. A subset of sample A (n = 122) completed a survey on non-adherence. The three methods were compared using linear and logistic regression. Multivariable analysis was used to investigate pre-transplant predictors of non-adherence. In sample B (transplant recipients 1995-2003, n = 544) Cox regression was used to determine the relationship between SD immunosuppressant level and graft failure.

Results: Non-adherence was found in 22-62 % of subjects, with the highest rates indicated by self-report. Clinician report of non-adherence was associated with both self-report and SD tacrolimus. On multivariable analysis, unemployment at time of listing and chart evidence of pre-transplant non-adherence were significant predictors of higher SD of tacrolimus. History of substance abuse and pre-transplant chart evidence of non-adherence were also significant independent predictors of post-transplant chart evidence of non-adherence. Drug variability in the immediate post-transplant setting was independently associated with graft failure over time (hazard ratio 1.005 per unit increase in standard deviation, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Non-adherence among liver transplant recipients is a common problem associated with increased risk of graft failure. SD tacrolimus can be used to measure non-adherent behavior and perhaps target patients for behavioral interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Transplant Proc. 2007 Dec;39(10):3169-74 - PubMed
    1. Transpl Int. 2005 Oct;18(10):1121-33 - PubMed
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Feb;83(2):165-8 - PubMed
    1. Clin Transplant. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):369-76 - PubMed
    1. Am J Transplant. 2008 Mar;8(3):616-26 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources