Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;17(2):228-35.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2030-3. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Eric S Hungness et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) is a novel endoscopic operation for the treatment of achalasia. Few POEM outcome data exist, and no study has compared POEM with the surgical standard, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM).

Methods: Perioperative outcomes were compared between POEM and LHM performed in a nonrandomized fashion. Patients in both groups met the following eligibility criteria: diagnosis of achalasia, age 18-85, and absence of prior achalasia treatment.

Results: Eighteen patients underwent POEM, and 55 patients underwent LHM. Operative times were shorter for POEM (113 vs. 125 min, p < .05), and estimated blood loss was less (≤10 ml in all cases vs. 50 ml, p < .001). Myotomy lengths, complication rates, and length of stay were similar. Pain scores were similar upon post-anesthesia care unit arrival and on postoperative day 1 but were higher at 2 h for POEM patients (3.5 vs. 2, p = .03). Narcotic requirements were similar, although fewer POEM patients received ketorolac. POEM patients' Eckardt scores decreased (median 1 postop vs. 7 preop, p < .001), and 16 (89 %) patients had a treatment success (score ≤3) at median 6-month follow-up. Six weeks after POEM, routine follow-up manometry and esophagram showed normalization of esophagogastric junction pressures and contrast column heights.

Conclusions: POEM and LHM appear to have similar perioperative outcomes. Further investigation is needed regarding long-term results after POEM.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):761-4 - PubMed
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Nov;32(10):1257-65 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3267-72 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):18-26 - PubMed
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1030-8 - PubMed

Publication types