Bubble-CPAP vs. Ventilatory-CPAP in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress
- PMID: 23056781
- PMCID: PMC3446163
Bubble-CPAP vs. Ventilatory-CPAP in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress
Abstract
Objective: Application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in neonate with respiratory distress is associated with reduction of respiratory failure, reduced complications and mortality. Bubble CPAP (B-CPAP) and ventilator-derived CPAP (V-CPAP) are two most popular CPAP modes. We aimed to determine whether B-CPAP and V-CPAP would have different survival rate and possible complications.
Methods: This prospective clinical trial was performed on 50 preterm neonates weighing 1000-2000 gr who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Afzalipoor Hospital because of respiratory distress between June 2009 and May 2010. Patients were randomly allocated into treatment groups using minimization technique. Survival analysis was applied to estimate and compare survival rates. Duration of oxygen therapy, hospital stay as well as hospitalization costs were compared using independent sample t-test.
Findings: Estimated survival rates at 24 hours in B-CPAP and V-CPAP groups were 100% and 77% respectively. Corresponding figures at 48 hours were 100% and 71%. In addition the hospitalization cost in V-CPAP group was significantly higher than in B-CPAP group.
Conclusion: According to our results, B-CPAP was effective in the treatment of neonates who were suffering from respiratory distress and reduced the duration of hospital stay. In addition to mentioned benefits, its low cost may be the reason to use B-CPAP broadly compared with V-CPAP.
Keywords: Bubble CPAP; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Respiratory Distress; Ventilator-derived CPAP.
Figures
References
-
- Chami M, Geoffray A. Pulmonary sequelae of prematurity: radiological manifestations. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl. 1997;16:51. - PubMed
-
- Chye JK, Gray PH. Rehospitalization and growth of infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a matched control study. J Paediatr Child Health. 1995;31(2):105–11. - PubMed
-
- Collaborative UK, Trial Group. ECMO. UK collaborative randomized trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet. 1996;348(9020):75–82. - PubMed
-
- Economic outcome for intensive care of infants of birthweight 500–999 g born in Victoria in the post surfactant era. The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. J Paediatr Child Health. 1997;33(3):202–8. - PubMed
-
- Vaucher YE, Dudell GG, Bejar R, Gist K. Predictors of early childhood outcome in candidates for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1996;128(1):109–17. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical