Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct 11;13(10):249.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-249.

Epialleles in plant evolution

Review

Epialleles in plant evolution

Detlef Weigel et al. Genome Biol. .

Abstract

Heritable phenotypic differences caused by epigenetic modifications, rather than DNA sequence mutations, pose a challenge to our understanding of natural variation. Here, we review what is known about plant epialleles and the role of epigenetics in evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classes of epialleles. (a) Epigenetic modifications and associated silencing of the adjacent gene is dependent on a specific cis-element, often a repetitive element. (b) Epigenetic modification is triggered by another locus or allele. Once the modification has been established, the trigger is no longer required for its maintenance. (c) Epigenetic modification is triggered by another locus or allele, but the trigger is permanently required.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The potential role of inherited epigenetic changes, comparing the effects of spontaneous and induced epimutations. A population of genotypically identical individuals is shown, which contain a single locus that can exist in two epigenetic states. Like spontaneous epimutations, induced epimutations are maintained across generations, but revert randomly without the inducing environment (which almost never happens for DNA mutations). The epiallele marked in purple is disadvantageous in a normal environment (leading to increased death; red crosses). In a stress environment (indicated by a thunder bolt), the unmodified allele (shown in grey) is disadvantageous. If the environment changes randomly from generation to generation, induced epivariation is unlikely to be advantageous. If there are longer episodes of stress, induced epivariation could be advantageous, and Darwinian selection might favor alleles that can become subject to induced epivariation. However, formalization is needed to determine the boundary conditions for such a scenario.

References

    1. Huxley J. Evolution: the Modern Synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2010.
    1. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.
    1. Grant-Downton RT, Dickinson HG. Epigenetics and its implications for plant biology. 2. The 'epigenetic epiphany': epigenetics, evolution and beyond. Ann Bot. 2006;97:11–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maderspacher F. Lysenko rising. Curr Biol. 2010;20:R835–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006;127:1309–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources