A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
- PMID: 23060188
- PMCID: PMC3511845
- DOI: 10.1038/nature11556
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Abstract
The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
Comment in
-
Reporting standards: Rigid guidelines may restrict research.Nature. 2012 Nov 8;491(7423):192. doi: 10.1038/491192c. Nature. 2012. PMID: 23135460 No abstract available.
-
Reproducibility: Research-reporting standards fall short.Nature. 2012 Dec 6;492(7427):41. doi: 10.1038/492041a. Nature. 2012. PMID: 23222599 No abstract available.
-
A standard error: distinguishing standard deviation from standard error.Diabetes. 2013 Aug;62(8):e15. doi: 10.2337/db13-0692. Diabetes. 2013. PMID: 23881207 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Dec 1;315(6):R1251-R1253. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 17. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018. PMID: 30332303 No abstract available.
References
-
- Begley CG, Ellis LM. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483:531–533. - PubMed
-
- Hess KR. Statistical design considerations in animal studies published recently in Cancer Research. Cancer Res. 2011;71:625. - PubMed
-
- Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:712. The first report that many published studies cannot be reproduced by the pharmaceutical industry. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous