Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 27:3:339.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339. eCollection 2012.

The theory behind the age-related positivity effect

Affiliations

The theory behind the age-related positivity effect

Andrew E Reed et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The "positivity effect" refers to an age-related trend that favors positive over negative stimuli in cognitive processing. Relative to their younger counterparts, older people attend to and remember more positive than negative information. Since the effect was initially identified and the conceptual basis articulated (Mather and Carstensen, 2005) scores of independent replications and related findings have appeared in the literature. Over the same period, a number of investigations have failed to observe age differences in the cognitive processing of emotional material. When findings are considered in theoretical context, a reliable pattern of evidence emerges that helps to refine conceptual tenets. In this article we articulate the operational definition and theoretical foundations of the positivity effect and review the empirical evidence based on studies of visual attention, memory, decision making, and neural activation. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions with emphasis on the conditions where a focus on positive information may benefit and/or impair cognitive performance in older people.

Keywords: aging; attention; emotion regulation; memory; motivation; positivity effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323–37010.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 - DOI
    1. Blanchard-Fields F. (2007). Everyday problem solving and emotion: an adult developmental perspective. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 26–3110.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00469.x - DOI
    1. Blanchard-Fields F., Mienaltowski A., Seay R. B. (2007). Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 62B, P61–P6410.1093/geronb/62.1.P61 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Budson A. E., Todman R. W., Chong H., Adams E. H., Kensinger E. A., Krangel T. S., Wright C. I. (2006). False recognition of emotional word lists in aging and Alzheimer disease. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 19, 71–7810.1097/01.wnn.0000213905.49525.d0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G., Bechara A., Tranel D., Hawkley L. C. (2011). “Could an aging brain contribute to subjective well-being? The value added by a social neuroscience perspective,” in Social Neuroscience: Toward Understanding the Underpinnings of the Social Mind, eds Todorov A., Fiske S. T., Prentice D. A. (New York: Oxford University Press; ), 249–262