Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1945-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.042. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

Role of circulating osteogenic progenitor cells in calcific aortic stenosis

Affiliations

Role of circulating osteogenic progenitor cells in calcific aortic stenosis

Mario Gössl et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Erratum in

  • J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2606. McGregor, Ulrike [added]

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells with osteoblastic phenotype (EPC-OCN) in human aortic valve calcification (AVC).

Background: Recent evidence suggests that rather than passive mineralization, AVC is an active atherosclerotic process with an osteoblastic component resembling coronary calcification. We have recently identified circulating EPCs with osteogenic properties carrying both endothelial progenitor (CD34, KDR) and osteoblastic (osteocalcin [OCN]) cell surface markers.

Methods: Blood samples from controls (n = 22) and patients with mild to moderate calcific aortic stenosis (mi-moAS, n = 17), severe calcific AS (sAS, n = 26), and both sAS and severe coronary artery disease (sCAD) (n = 33) were collected during diagnostic coronary angiography. By using flow cytometry, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed for CD34, KDR, and OCN. Resected normal and calcified aortic valves were analyzed histologically.

Results: Patients with mi-moAS and patients with sAS/sCAD had significantly less EPCs (CD34+/KDR+/OCN-) than controls. Patients with sAS showed significantly higher numbers of EPC-OCN (CD34+/KDR+/OCN+) than controls. In addition, the percentage of EPC costaining for OCN was higher in all disease groups compared with controls. A subgroup analysis of younger patients with bicuspid sAS showed a similar pattern of significantly lower EPCs but a high percentage of coexpression of OCN. Immunofluorescence showed colocalization of nuclear factor kappa-B and OCN in diseased and normal valves. CD34+/OCN+ cells were abundant in the endothelial and deeper cell layers of calcific aortic valve tissue but not in normal aortic valve tissue.

Conclusions: Circulating EPC-OCN may play a significant role in the pathogenesis and as markers of prognostication of calcific AS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Circulating EPC-OCN in All 4 Study Groups
Patients with mi-moAS and sAS showed higher numbers of circulating endothelial progenitor cells with osteoblastic phenotype (EPC-OCN) than normal subjects, whereas patients with both sAS and sCAD had numbers of circulating EPC-OCN similar to those of normal subjects. *p = 0.024 versus normal subjects. Median values and interquartile ranges are shown; diamonds represent mean values. CAD = coronary artery disease; mi-moAS = mild to moderate calcific aortic stenosis; sAS = severe calcific aortic stenosis; sCAD = severe coronary artery disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of OCN Costaining of EPCs in All 4 Study Groups
All disease groups showed a higher percentage of costaining of circulating EPCs for osteocalcin (OCN) than normal subjects, reaching statistical significance in all but the sAS group. *p < 0.001, #p = 0.043 versus normal subjects. Median values and interquartile ranges are shown; diamonds represent mean values. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Circulating EPCs in All 4 Study Groups
Patients with mi-moAS and patients with both sAS and sCAD showed significantly less circulating EPCs than normal subjects. *p < 0.001, #p = 0.003 versus normal subjects. Median values and interquartile ranges are shown; diamonds represent mean values. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Colocalization of Inflammation and Osteoblastic Activity
Immunofluorescence staining for nuclear factor kappa-B (NFkB) (red) and osteocalcin (OCN) (green) of control (A, B) and severely calcified aortic valves (C, D; blue represents DAPI stain). NFkB and OCN demonstrate colocalization (yellow, examples indicated by white arrowheads), indicating that the osteoblastic process is associated with inflammation. Whereas calcified aortic valves show NFkB/OCN costaining within the endothelial cell layer (C) and the deeper valve tissue layers (D), control valves show costaining only within the valve (B) and not within the endothelial cell layer (A). Magnification ×40. For individual color channels, please see Online Figures 1 and 2. AS = aortic stenosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Immunofluorescence Staining for Osteoblastic Progenitor Cells
Immunofluorescence staining for CD34 (red) and osteocalcin (OCN) (green) of normal (A, B) and severely calcified aortic valves (C, D; blue represents DAPI stain). CD34/OCN costaining (yellow, examples indicated by white arrow-heads) is rarely observed within deeper valve tissue of control valves (B), but not within the endothelial cell layer (A). In contrast, CD34/OCN cells are abundant within the endothelial cell layer (C) and deeper valve tissue (D) of severely calcified valves. Magnification ×40. For individual color channels, please see Online Figures 1 and 2. AS = aortic stenosis.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Possible Role of Circulating EPC-OCN in AVC
In the hypothesized interplay among the circulating EPC-OCN, the endothelial cell layers of the aortic valve, and the VICs, EPC-OCN may engraft into the endothelial cell layer or enter deeper valvular tissue layers and become VICs (see “Discussion” for further details). AVC = aortic valve calcification; EC = endothelial cell; EPC-OCN = circulating endothelial progenitor cells with osteoblastic phenotype; VIC = valve interstitial cell.

Comment in

  • Boning-up on aortic valve calcification.
    Mohler ER 3rd, Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ. Mohler ER 3rd, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1954-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.961. Epub 2012 Oct 10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23062540 No abstract available.

References

    1. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1220–5. - PubMed
    1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11. - PubMed
    1. Rajamannan NM. Calcific aortic stenosis: lessons learned from experimental and clinical studies. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:162–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross J, Jr, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1968;38:61–7. - PubMed
    1. Mohler ER, 3rd, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG, Kaplan FS. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation. 2001;103:1522–8. - PubMed

Publication types