Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1216-25.
doi: 10.1177/193229681200600527.

Use of a computerized tracking system to monitor and provide feedback on dietary goals for calorie-restricted diets: the POUNDS LOST study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of a computerized tracking system to monitor and provide feedback on dietary goals for calorie-restricted diets: the POUNDS LOST study

Stephen D Anton et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol. .

Abstract

The use of self-monitoring as a tool to facilitate behavioral modification is common in many lifestyle-based weight loss interventions. Electronic tracking programs, including computer-based systems and smart phone applications, have been developed to allow individuals to self-monitor their behavior digitally. These programs offer an advantage over traditional self-report modalities in that they can provide users with direct feedback about dietary and/or physical activity adherence levels and thereby assist them in real-time decision making. This article describes the use of an Internet-based computerized tracking system (CTS) that was developed specifically for the POUNDS LOST study, a 2-year randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of four macronutrient diets for weight and fat reduction in healthy, overweight men and women (body mass index range = 25.0-39.9 kg/m(2)). The CTS served many functions in this study, including data collection, dietary and exercise assessment and feedback, messaging system, and report generation. Across all groups, participants with high usage of the CTS during the initial 8 weeks lost greater amounts of weight than participants with low usage (8.7% versus 5.5% of initial body weight, respectively; p < .001) at week 32. Rates of CTS utilization were highest during the first year of this 2-year intervention, and utilization of the CTS declined steadily over time. The unique features of the CTS combined with technological developments, such as smart phone applications, offer significant potential to improve the user's self-monitoring experience and adherence to health promotion programs designed specifically for individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Feedback given to the participant after entering food intake into the CTS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) System utilization defined as the percentage of participants who recorded their food intake in the CTS at least one time per week during the 2-year dietary intervention in the POUNDS LOST Study at site 1. This site maintained the methodology for provision of dietary feedback from the CTS at the end of each day throughout the study. The error bars represent the variations that occurred across the six cohorts. (B) System utilization defined as the percentage of participants who recorded their food intake in the CTS at least one time per week during the 2-year dietary intervention in the POUNDS LOST Study at site 2. This site changed the methodology for provision of dietary feedback so that feedback was provided after each meal instead of at the end of each day. The error bars represent the variations that occurred across the six cohorts.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Utilization of the CTS at both sites before and after the change in the timing of dietary feedback. Specifically, site 2 (bottom line, “feedback change”) changed the methodology for provision of dietary feedback so that feedback was provided after each meal instead of at the end of each day. Participants at site 1 (top line, “no change”) received feedback only at the end of the day throughout the entire study.

References

    1. Ogden CL, Yanovski SZ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. The epidemiology of obesity. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2087–2102. - PubMed
    1. Bray GA, Smith SR, de Jonge L, Xie H, Rood J, Martin CK, Most M, Brock C, Mancuso S, Redman LM. Effect of dietary protein content on weight gain, energy expenditure, and body composition during overeating: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;307(1):47–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheen AJ. The future of obesity: new drugs versus lifestyle interventions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17(3):263–267. - PubMed
    1. Perri MG, Foreyt JP, Anton SD. Preventing weight regain after weight loss. In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, editors. Handbook of obesity treatment: clinical applications. 3rd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2011.
    1. Germann JN, Kirschenbaum DS, Rich BH. Child and parental self-monitoring as determinants of success in the treatment of morbid obesity in low-income minority children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32(1):111–121. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms