Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d.

Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey

Naomi Dyer  1 , Joann S Sorra, Scott Alan Smith, Paul D Cleary, Ron D Hays
Affiliations

Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey

Naomi Dyer et al. Med Care. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey enables patients to report their experiences with outpatient medical offices.

Objective: To evaluate the factor structure and reliability of the CAHPS Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Adult Visit Survey.

Data source: Data from 21,318 patients receiving care in 450 clinical practice sites collected from March 2010 to December 2010 were analyzed from the CG-CAHPS Database.

Research design and participants: Individual level and multilevel confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine CAHPS survey responses at the patient and practice site levels. We also estimated internal consistency reliability and practice site level reliability. Correlations among multi-item composites and correlations between the composites and 2 global rating items were examined.

Measures: Scores on CG-CAHPS composites assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, Courteous/Helpful Staff, and 2 global ratings of whether one would Recommend their Doctor, and an Overall Doctor Rating.

Results: Analyses provide support for the hypothesized 3-factor model assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, and Courteous/Helpful Staff. In addition, the internal consistency reliabilities were ≥ 0.77 and practice site level reliabilities for sites with >4 clinicians were ≥ 0.75. All composites were positively and significantly correlated with the 2 global rating items, with Doctor Communication having the strongest relationship with the global ratings.

Conclusions: The CG-CAHPS Adult Visit Survey has acceptable psychometric properties at the individual level and practice site level. The analyses suggest that the survey items are measuring their intended concepts and yield reliable information.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43:53–60. - PubMed
    1. Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 Adult Core Survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(PartI):1509–1527. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hays RD, Brown J, Brown L, et al. Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Analyses of Multi-Item Scales Assessing Parents’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Dental Care. Med Care. 2006;44(Suppl 3):S60–S68. - PubMed
    1. Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams V, et al. Psychometric Properties of the CAHPS™ 1.0 Survey Measures. Med Care. 1999;37(Suppl 3):MS22–MS31. - PubMed
    1. O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Hays RD, et al. Exploratory Factor Analyses of the CAHPSs Hospital Pilot Survey Responses across and within Medical, Surgical, and Obstetric Services. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(Part II):2078–2095. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms