Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012;7(10):e47211.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047211. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

RANTES gene G-403A polymorphism and coronary artery disease: a meta analysis of observational studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

RANTES gene G-403A polymorphism and coronary artery disease: a meta analysis of observational studies

Jun Liu et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: The G-403A polymorphism in RANTES gene may be involved in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) through increasing RANTES-mediated leukocyte trafficking and activation. However, studies investigating the relationship between G-403A polymorphism and CAD yielded contradictory and inconclusive results. In order to shed some light on these inconsistent findings, a meta analysis was performed to clarify the role of G-403A polymorphism of RANTES gene in the susceptibility of CAD.

Methods: A systemic literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from their inception to March 23, 2012, to retrieve related studies. In addition, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science was searched, authors of relevant studies were contacted, and reference lists of the included studies and their related citations in PubMed were reviewed for additional pertinent studies.

Results: A total of 8 eligible studies were identified, with a total of 4252 CAD cases and 2150 controls. There was no evidence of significant association between G-403A polymorphism and CAD risk in any genetic model or pairwise comparisons (additive model: OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 0.883-1.239, I(2) = 65.9%; recessive model: OR = 1.140, 95% CI = 0.774-1.678, I(2) = 53.1%; dominant model: OR = 1.000, 95% CI = 0.820-1.21), I(2) = 62.6%; AA vs GG: OR = 1.141, 95% CI = 0.734-1.773, I(2) = 61.2%; GA vs GG: OR = 0.993, 95% CI = 0.800-1.232, I(2) = 64.6%). Subgroup analysis and meta regression indicated that ethnicity and genotyping method accounted for the significant heterogeneity among studies. In the stratified analysis by ethnic group, G-403A polymorphism was found to be associated with increased CAD risk in Caucasian population whereas its protective role was observed in Asian population in some but not all comparisons.

Conclusion: Data from the current meta-analysis do not support the existence of a relationship between G-403A polymorphism and the development of CAD, and large sample size study employing unified genotyping method is needed to further evaluate the influence of G-403A polymorphism on susceptibility of CAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of literature identification and filtration in the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results of association between the G-403A polymorphism and coronary artery disease.
The overall odds ratio (OR) was estimated with DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. The ORs of individual studies are shown as squares, with the size proportional to the weight of each study in the overall estimate; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown as horizontal lines. The pooled OR and its 95% CI are shown as a dashed vertical line and a diamond, respectively. A, Additive model. B, Recessive model. C, Dominant model. D, AA versus GG. E, GA versus GG.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Begg’s funnel plot of publication bias with pseudo 95% confidence limits.
The horizontal line in the funnel plot indicates the random effects summary estimate, while the sloping lines indicate the expected 95% confidence intervals for a given standard error, assuming no heterogeneity between studies. Each study is represented by a circle, the area of which represents the study’s precision. A, Additive model (Egger’s test P = 0.643). B, Recessive model (Egger’s test P = 0.020 ). C, Dominant model (Egger’s test P = 0.519). D, AA versus GG (Egger’s test P = 0.014). E, GA versus GG (Egger’s test P = 0.429).

References

    1. Li JJ (2011) Inflammation in coronary artery diseases. Chin Med J 124: 3568–3575. - PubMed
    1. Ley K, Miller YI, Hedrick CC (2011) Monocyte and Macrophage Dynamics During Atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 1506–1516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zernecke A, Weber C (2010) Chemokines in the vascular inflammatory response of atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res 86: 192–201. - PubMed
    1. Pattison JM, Nelson PJ, Huie P, Sibley RK, Krensky AM (1996) RANTES chemokine expression in transplant-associated accelerated atherosclerosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 15: 1194–1199. - PubMed
    1. Schober A, Manka D, von Hundelshausen P, Huo Y, Hanrath P, et al. (2002) Deposition of Platelet RANTES Triggering Monocyte Recruitment Requires P-Selectin and Is Involved in Neointima Formation After Arterial Injury. Circulation 106: 1523–1529. - PubMed

Publication types