Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2012 Nov;21(11):1128-9.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3994. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Cervical cancer screening measures need to evolve to continue to tell the story

Mona Saraiya, Meg Watson, Vicki B Benard
Editorial

Cervical cancer screening measures need to evolve to continue to tell the story

Mona Saraiya et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Comment on

References

    1. Chen H-Y, Kessler CL, Mori N, Chauhan SP. Cervical cancer screening in the United States, 1993–2010: Characteristics of women who are never screened. J Womens Health. 2012;21:xxx–xxx. - PubMed
    1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:516–542. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventions Services Task Force Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:880–891. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. No. 109. Cervical cytology screening. 2009 - PubMed
    1. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367:489–498. - PubMed

MeSH terms