Identifying an outbreak of a novel swine disease using test requests for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome as a syndromic surveillance tool
- PMID: 23072647
- PMCID: PMC3514316
- DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-192
Identifying an outbreak of a novel swine disease using test requests for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome as a syndromic surveillance tool
Abstract
Background: Animal disease monitoring and surveillance are crucial for ensuring the health of animals, humans and the environment. Many studies have investigated the utility of monitoring syndromes associated with data from veterinary laboratory submissions, but no research has focused on how negative test results from a veterinary diagnostic laboratory data can be used to improve our knowledge of disease outbreaks. For example, if a diagnostic laboratory was seeing a disproportionate number of negative test results for a known disease could this information be an indication of a novel disease outbreak? The objective of this study was to determine the association between the porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD) outbreak in Ontario 2004-2006 and the results of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PPRSV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the results of PRRSV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests requested by veterinarians.
Results: Retrospective data were collected from the Animal Health Laboratory (AHL) at the University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario Canada and were comprised of weekly counts of PRRSV ELISA and PRRSV PCR diagnostic tests requested by swine practitioners from 2000-2007. The results of the PRRSV ELISA and PRRSV PCRs were analysed separately in two models using logistic regression with the dependent variables being: the weekly probability of PRRSV ELISA positivity, and the weekly probability of PRRSV PCR positivity, respectively. The weekly probability of PRRSV PCR positivity decreased during the PVCAD outbreak (OR=0.66, P=0.01). The weekly probability of PRRSV ELISA positivity was not associated with the PCVAD outbreak.
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that during the PCVAD outbreak in Ontario from December 2004-May 2006, the probability of a positive PRRSV PCR at the AHL decreased. We conclude that when a decrease in test positivity occurs for a known disease, it may suggest that a new disease agent is emerging in the population. Hence, monitoring the test results of commonly used first-order tests for a known disease (e.g. PRRSV) has the potential to be a unique form of syndromic data for the timely identification of novel disease outbreaks in swine populations.
Figures






Similar articles
-
The association between submission counts to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory and the economic and disease challenges of the Ontario swine industry from 1998 to 2009.Prev Vet Med. 2012 Oct 1;106(3-4):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 9. Prev Vet Med. 2012. PMID: 22494906
-
Diagnostic performance measures of ELISA and quantitative PCR tests for porcine circovirus type 2 exposure using Bayesian latent class analysis.Prev Vet Med. 2011 Aug 1;101(1-2):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 31. Prev Vet Med. 2011. PMID: 21632130
-
Multiplex method for simultaneous serological detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine circovirus type 2.J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Sep;49(9):3184-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00557-11. Epub 2011 Jul 6. J Clin Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21734031 Free PMC article.
-
Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infections: clinical signs, pathology and laboratory diagnosis.Virus Res. 2012 Mar;164(1-2):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Oct 17. Virus Res. 2012. PMID: 22056845 Review.
-
Porcine respiratory disease complex: Interaction of vaccination and porcine circovirus type 2, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.Vet J. 2016 Jun;212:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct 23. Vet J. 2016. PMID: 27256017 Review.
Cited by
-
Using diagnostic data from veterinary diagnostic laboratories to unravel macroepidemiological aspects of porcine circoviruses 2 and 3 in the United States from 2002-2023.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0311807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311807. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39656698 Free PMC article.
-
Data standardization implementation and applications within and among diagnostic laboratories: integrating and monitoring enteric coronaviruses.J Vet Diagn Invest. 2021 May;33(3):457-468. doi: 10.1177/10406387211002163. Epub 2021 Mar 19. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2021. PMID: 33739188 Free PMC article.
-
How do pig veterinarians view technology-assisted data utilisation for pig health and welfare management? A qualitative study in Spain, the Netherlands, and Ireland.Porcine Health Manag. 2024 Oct 10;10(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00389-3. Porcine Health Manag. 2024. PMID: 39390537 Free PMC article.
-
Animal health syndromic surveillance: a systematic literature review of the progress in the last 5 years (2011-2016).Vet Med (Auckl). 2016 Nov 15;7:157-170. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S90182. eCollection 2016. Vet Med (Auckl). 2016. PMID: 30050848 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic testing patterns for Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in Ontario horses during the years 2008 to 2018.Can Vet J. 2021 Jun;62(6):629-636. Can Vet J. 2021. PMID: 34219772 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schmitt BJ. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories and their support role for veterinary services. Rev Sci Tech. 2003;22(2):533–536. - PubMed
-
- Stark KDC, Nevel A. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the pig health monitoring systems used in England. Veterinary record: journal of the British Veterinary Association. 2009;165(16):461–465. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources