Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;41(3):240-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.332. Epub 2012 Oct 13.

Are health care workers protected? An observational study of selection and removal of personal protective equipment in Canadian acute care hospitals

Robyn Mitchell  1 , Virginia Roth, Denise Gravel, George Astrakianakis, Elizabeth Bryce, Sarah Forgie, Lynn Johnston, Geoffrey Taylor, Mary Vearncombe; Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program
Collaborators, Affiliations

Are health care workers protected? An observational study of selection and removal of personal protective equipment in Canadian acute care hospitals

Robyn Mitchell et al. Am J Infect Control. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by health care workers (HCWs) is vital in preventing the spread of infection and has implications for HCW safety.

Methods: An observational study was performed in 11 hospitals participating in the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program between January 7 and March 30, 2011. Using a standardized data collection tool, observers recorded HCWs selecting and removing PPE and performing hand hygiene on entry into the rooms of febrile respiratory illness patients.

Results: The majority of HCWs put on gloves (88%, n = 390), gown (83%, n = 368), and mask (88%, n = 386). Only 37% (n = 163) were observed to have put on eye protection. Working in a pediatric unit was significantly associated with not wearing eye protection (7%), gown (70%), gloves (77%), or mask (79%). Half of the observed HCWs (54%, n = 206) removed their PPE in the correct sequence. Twenty-six percent performed hand hygiene after removing their gloves, 46% after removing their gown, and 57% after removing their mask and/or eye protection.

Conclusion: Overall adherence with appropriate PPE use in health care settings involving febrile respiratory illness patients was modest, particularly on pediatric units. Interventions to improve PPE use should be targeted toward the use of recommended precautions (eg, eye protection), HCWs working in pediatric units, the correct sequence of PPE removal, and performing hand hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Weber D.J., Sickbert-Bennett E.E., Brown V.M., Kittrell I.P., Adams T.L. Compliance with Isolation Precautions at a University Hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:358–361. - PubMed
    1. Swaminathan A., Martin R., Gamon S., Aboltins C., Athan E., Braitberg G. Personal protective equipment and antiviral drug use during hospitalization for suspected avian or pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1541–1547. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gammon J., Morgan-Samuel H., Gould D. A review of the evidence of suboptimal compliance of healthcare practitioners to standard/universal infection control precautions. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:157–167. - PubMed
    1. Ganczack M., Szych Z. Surgical nurses and compliance with personal protective equipment. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66:346–351. - PubMed
    1. Daugherty E.L., Perl T.M., Needham D.M., Rubinson L., Bilderback A., Rand C.S. The user of personal protective equipment for control of influenza among critical care clinicians: a survey study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1210–1216. - PubMed