Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 1;53(6):1147-53.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.6.1147.

Quantitative assessment of tumor responses after radiation therapy in a DLD-1 colon cancer mouse model using serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Affiliations

Quantitative assessment of tumor responses after radiation therapy in a DLD-1 colon cancer mouse model using serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Sung Jun Ahn et al. Yonsei Med J. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictability of pretreatment values including Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) derived parameters (K(trans), K(ep) and V(e)), early changes in parameters (K(trans), tumor volume), and heterogeneity (standard deviation of K(trans)) for radiation therapy responses via a human colorectal cancer xenograft model.

Materials and methods: A human colorectal cancer xenograft model with DLD-1 cancer cells was produced in the right hind limbs of five mice. Tumors were irradiated with 3 fractions of 3 Gy each for 3 weeks. Baseline and follow up DCE-MRI were performed. Quantitative parameters (K(trans), K(ep) and V(e)) were calculated based on the Tofts model. Early changes in K(trans), standard deviation (SD) of K(trans), and tumor volume were also calculated. Tumor responses were evaluated based on histology. With a cut-off value of 0.4 for necrotic factor, a comparison between good and poor responses was conducted.

Results: The good response group (mice #1 and 2) exhibited higher pretreatment K(trans) than the poor response group (mice #3, 4, and 5). The good response group tended to show lower pretreatment K(ep), higher pretreatment V(e), and larger baseline tumor volume than the poor response group. All the mice in the good response group demonstrated marked reductions in K(trans) and SD value after the first radiation. All tumors showed increased volume after the first radiation therapy.

Conclusion: The good response after radiation therapy group in the DLD-1 colon cancer xenograft nude mouse model exhibited a higher pretreatment K(trans) and showed an early reduction in K(trans), demonstrating a more homogenous distribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An exceptional case, mouse #3, was assigned to the poor response group although it showed a large area of necrosis (NF=0.49). (A) Serial DCE-MRI with color mapping shows the change in Ktrans. Pretreatment Ktrans showed a relatively low value (0.11). Ktrans increased after the first radiation therapy (K1R=1.51). Red color represents the higher value of Ktrans and blue color represents the lower value. An outgrowing tumor was identified after the first radiation therapy (arrow). (B) H&E staining of the newly grown tumor, which separated from the main mass, showed rare necrosis. The original magnification is ×2. The red line indicates the tumor border and the blue line indicates the area of necrosis. NF, necrotic fraction; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of quantitative parameters between the good and the poor response groups upon baseline imaging. (A) Ktrans, (B) Kep, (C) Ve, (D) pretreatment tumor volume.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of Ktrans between the good and the poor response groups after the 1st radiation therapy. (A) Early changes in Ktrans and (B) early changes in standard deviation for Ktrans (SD). The y-axis represents the ratio of the value after the 1st radiation therapy to the pretreatment value. The horizontal solid line at the ratio of 1 represents no change within the interval.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A representative case of good response in mouse #2. (A) Serial DCE-MRI with color mapping shows higher pretreatment Ktrans (0.29) and marked reduction in Ktrans after the first radiation therapy (K1R=0.47). (B) H&E staining of the corresponding section in mouse #2. The original magnification is ×2. Necrosis is identified in the center of the tumor. The red line indicates the tumor border and the blue line indicates the area of necrosis. The necrosis factor was 0.46. Histogram shows the heterogeneous distribution of Ktrans at baseline with an SD of 0.09 (C) and the homogenous distribution of Ktrans with an SD of 0.05 after the first radiation therapy (D). DCE-MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

References

    1. Lindmark G, Gerdin B, Påhlman L, Bergström R, Glimelius B. Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1219–1227. - PubMed
    1. Marsh PJ, James RD, Schofield PF. Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1205–1214. - PubMed
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–1740. - PubMed
    1. Påhlman L, Glimelius B. The value of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1347–1350. - PubMed
    1. Harrison LB, Chadha M, Hill RJ, Hu K, Shasha D. Impact of tumor hypoxia and anemia on radiation therapy outcomes. Oncologist. 2002;7:492–508. - PubMed

Publication types