Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;18(1):95-110.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12012. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia

Karen J Burnell  1 , Amber Selwood, Theresa Sullivan, Georgina M Charlesworth, Fiona Poland, Martin Orrell
Affiliations

Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia

Karen J Burnell et al. Health Expect. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Involving service users in research can be an effective way of improving the practicalities and acceptability of interventions for target end users.

Objectives: The current paper presented two consensus methods, not commonly used in consultation with service users, to develop a peer support intervention for family carers of people with dementia (SHIELD Carer Supporter Programme).

Design: Study 1 was a modified Delphi process combined with a consensus conference to explore details of the intervention from the carer and volunteer perspective. Study 2 was an anonymous reader consultation to develop informed consent documents for the intervention trial. Median scores were used to measure and establish consensus. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed.

Setting and participants: Study 1: twenty-five delegates participated (eight were current/former carers) in the first round Delphi questionnaire, with 21 attending the conference. Five completed the Round 2 questionnaire. Study 2: six family carers and 11 people with dementia took part in the consultation.

Results: Study 1: the role of the peer supporters was developed in terms of relational and practical aspects of the intervention. Study 2: changes were made to the documents, reflecting service user input, but the effectiveness of this less discursive type of service user involvement was unclear.

Discussion and conclusions: Study 1 methods allowed for service users to contribute significantly and meaningfully, but maybe limiting some design innovation. Study 2 took a more traditional and less collaborative approach. This has implications for balancing the needs of the research with meaningful service user involvement in research.

Keywords: Delphi methods; carer; consultation methods; dementia; informed consent consultation; service user involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of consensus methods used in the development of Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health . Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. London: Department of Health, 2006. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health . Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. London: Department of Health, 2009.
    1. Craig N, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Pettigrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal, 2008; 337: a1655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006; Issue 3: Art. No.: CD004563 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2. Updated 2010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasby J, Beresford P. Who knows best? Evidence‐based practice and service user contribution. Critical Social Policy, 2006; 28: 268–284.

Publication types