General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease
- PMID: 23076952
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub2
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease
Update in
-
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD009009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30699470 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: General health checks are common elements of health care in some countries. These aim to detect disease and risk factors for disease with the purpose of reducing morbidity and mortality. Most of the commonly used screening tests offered in general health checks have been incompletely studied. Also, screening leads to increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which can be harmful as well as beneficial. It is, therefore, important to assess whether general health checks do more good than harm.
Objectives: We aimed to quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes such as blood pressure and serum cholesterol levels.
Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to July 2012. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, assessed papers for eligibility and read reference lists. One author used citation tracking (Web of Knowledge) and asked trialists about additional studies.
Selection criteria: We included randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adults unselected for disease or risk factors. We did not include geriatric trials. We defined health checks as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system.
Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary. For mortality outcomes we analysed the results with random-effects model meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.
Main results: We included 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182,880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (155,899 participants, 11,940 deaths), median follow-up time nine years, giving a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (152,435 participants, 4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.17) and eight trials on cancer mortality (139,290 participants, 3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings.We did not find an effect on clinical events or other measures of morbidity but one trial found an increased occurrence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia with screening and one trial found an increased occurence of self-reported chronic disease. One trial found a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared to the control group. No trials compared the total number of prescriptions, but two out of four trials found an increased number of people using antihypertensive drugs. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self-reported health, but this could be due to reporting bias as the trials were not blinded. We did not find an effect on admission to hospital, disability, worry, additional visits to the physician, or absence from work, but most of these outcomes were poorly studied. We did not find useful results on the number of referrals to specialists, the number of follow-up tests after positive screening results, or the amount of surgery.
Authors' conclusions: General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although the number of new diagnoses was increased. Important harmful outcomes, such as the number of follow-up diagnostic procedures or short term psychological effects, were often not studied or reported and many trials had methodological problems. With the large number of participants and deaths included, the long follow-up periods used, and considering that cardiovascular and cancer mortality were not reduced, general health checks are unlikely to be beneficial.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: General health checks in adults do not reduce all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 15;158(2):JC2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-02002. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23318336 No abstract available.
-
General health checks may not reduce morbidity or mortality but do increase the number of new diagnoses.Evid Based Nurs. 2013 Oct;16(4):111-2. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-101158. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Evid Based Nurs. 2013. PMID: 23349244 No abstract available.
-
Population-based health checks are here, RCTs or not.Evid Based Med. 2013 Dec;18(6):216-7. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101229. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Evid Based Med. 2013. PMID: 23513206 No abstract available.
-
General health checks for reducing morbidity and mortality.Am Fam Physician. 2013 Oct 1;88(7):432-3. Am Fam Physician. 2013. PMID: 24134081 No abstract available.
-
Ethical issues related to health checks.BMJ. 2014 Jul 30;349:g4787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4787. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 25078117 No abstract available.
-
Authors' reply to Lauritzen and colleagues, Newton and colleagues, and Mangin.BMJ. 2014 Jul 30;349:g4790. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4790. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 25078532 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2012 Nov 20;345:e7191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7191. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 23169868 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28922704 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28972652 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The long-term effect of screening and lifestyle counseling on changes in physical activity and diet: the Inter99 Study - a randomized controlled trial.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Mar 6;12:33. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0195-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015. PMID: 25886540 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of the population-based Check your health preventive programme conducted in primary care with 4 years follow-up [the CORE trial]: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2014 Aug 29;15:341. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-341. Trials. 2014. PMID: 25169211 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications.Public Health Rev. 2015 Nov 5;36:8. doi: 10.1186/s40985-015-0012-1. eCollection 2015. Public Health Rev. 2015. PMID: 29450036 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 10;14:1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1057. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25300392 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?BMJ. 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3725. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24927763 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources