Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18488-92.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216223109. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution

Affiliations

Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution

Way Sung et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Mutation dictates the tempo and mode of evolution, and like all traits, the mutation rate is subject to evolutionary modification. Here, we report refined estimates of the mutation rate for a prokaryote with an exceptionally small genome and for a unicellular eukaryote with a large genome. Combined with prior results, these estimates provide the basis for a potentially unifying explanation for the wide range in mutation rates that exists among organisms. Natural selection appears to reduce the mutation rate of a species to a level that scales negatively with both the effective population size (N(e)), which imposes a drift barrier to the evolution of molecular refinements, and the genomic content of coding DNA, which is proportional to the target size for deleterious mutations. As a consequence of an expansion in genome size, some microbial eukaryotes with large N(e) appear to have evolved mutation rates that are lower than those known to occur in prokaryotes, but multicellular eukaryotes have experienced elevations in the genome-wide deleterious mutation rate because of substantial reductions in N(e).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) Relationship between the base-substitutional mutation rate/site/cell division and genome size. The regression includes all points except the four uppermost eukaryotes, for which the mutation-rate estimates are based on reporter constructs, log10u = −8.663–1.096log10G, where u is the mutation rate, and G is the genome size in megabases (r2 = 0.872, df = 21). Points surrounded by a circle are based on mutation-accumulation experiments involving whole-genome sequencing; all others are based on reporter constructs. For euykaryotes: Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Nc, Neurospora crassa; Pf, Plasmodium falciparum; Pt, Paramecium tetraurelia; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sp, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Tb, Trypanosoma brucei. The prokaryote reported in this study, Mesoplasma florum, is denoted as Mf. The dashed regression line to the lower right includes multicellular eukaryotes (not shown) (4). (B) Relationship between the base-substitutional mutation rate/site/cell division and the effective population size (Ne) extrapolated from silent-site diversity. Eukaryotic regression (black): log10u = −3.145–0.916log10Ne (r2 = 0.831); prokaryotic regression (blue): log10u = −3.920–0.699log10Ne (r2 = 0.794). Labeled prokaryotic data points: Bs, Bacillus subtilis; Ec, Escherichia coli; Hp, Helicobacter pylori; Mt, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Pa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sa, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (archaea); Se, Salmonella enterica; Tt, Thermus thermophila. (C) Relationship between genome-wide mutation rate/cell division for coding DNA and Ne. Regression: log10(uGe) = 3.109–0.757log10Ne (r2 = 0.844). The data for multicellular eukaryotes (red) are summarized in Tables S8, S9, and S10, which are slight updates from the data previously summarized (4).

Comment in

References

    1. Lynch M. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of spontaneous mutations in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;107(3):961–968. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hershberg R, Petrov DA. Evidence that mutation is universally biased towards AT in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hildebrand F, Meyer A, Eyre-Walker A. Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lynch M. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 2010;26(8):345–352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mira A, Ochman H, Moran NA. Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet. 2001;17(10):589–596. - PubMed

Publication types