Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;27(1):28-36.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.213. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review

S A Maguire  1 , P O Watts, A D Shaw, S Holden, R H Taylor, W J Watkins, M K Mann, V Tempest, A M Kemp
Affiliations

Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review

S A Maguire et al. Eye (Lond). 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To report the retinal signs that distinguish abusive head trauma (AHT) from non-abusive head trauma (nAHT).

Methods: A systematic review of literature, 1950-2009, was conducted with standardised critical appraisal. Inclusion criteria were a strict confirmation of the aetiology, children aged <11 years and details of an examination conducted by an ophthalmologist. Post mortem data, organic disease of eye, and inadequate examinations were excluded. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine odds ratios (OR) and probabilities for AHT.

Results: Of the 62 included studies, 13 provided prevalence data (998 children, 504 AHT). Overall, retinal haemorrhages (RH) were found in 78% of AHT vs 5% of nAHT. In a child with head trauma and RH, the OR that this is AHT is 14.7 (95% confidence intervals 6.39, 33.62) and the probability of abuse is 91%. Where recorded, RH were bilateral in 83% of AHT compared with 8.3% in nAHT. RH were numerous in AHT, and few in nAHT located in the posterior pole, with only 10% extending to periphery. True prevalence of additional features, for example, retinal folds, could not be determined.

Conclusions: Our systematic review confirms that although certain patterns of RH were far commoner in AHT, namely large numbers of RH in both the eyes, present in all layers of the retina, and extension into the periphery, there was no retinal sign that was unique to abusive injury. RH are rare in accidental trauma and, when present, are predominantly unilateral, few in number and in the posterior pole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systematic review search strategy and review process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Odds of AHT in a child with RH: multilevel logistic regression analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Levin AV. Ophthalmology of shaken baby syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2002;13:201–211. - PubMed
    1. Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D, Mann M, Tempest V, Kemp AM. Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:860–867. - PubMed
    1. Greenwald MJ, Weiss A, Oesterle CS, Friendly DS. Traumatic retinoschisis in battered babies. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:618–625. - PubMed
    1. Massicotte SJ, Folberg R, Torczynski E, Gilliland MG, Luckenbach MW. Vitreoretinal traction and perimacular retinal folds in the eyes of deliberately traumatized children. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1124–1127. - PubMed
    1. Lantz PE, Sinal SH, Stanton CA, Weaver RG. Perimacular retinal folds from childhood head trauma. Br Med J. 2004;328:754–756. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types