Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Feb;17(1):21-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0904-8. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

External haemorrhoidal thrombosis: evidence for current management

Affiliations
Review

External haemorrhoidal thrombosis: evidence for current management

K K W Chan et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: External haemorrhoidal thrombosis (EHT) may be managed surgically or conservatively. The optimal treatment is, however, unclear, as is the long-term outcome following treatment.

Methods: A literature search was undertaken to review and grade the evidence available for EHT management, determine the optimal management modality and assess long-term outcome after each treatment.

Results: Among 800 articles on haemorrhoids, only two prospective studies encompassing 248 patients and two retrospective studies of 571 patients were found. Excision significantly relieves presenting symptoms by postoperative day 4 compared with incision or topical GTN (Level IB evidence). Symptoms last over 3 weeks with conservative treatment (Level III evidence) and this period may be reduced by combining topical nifedipine and lignocaine rather than using lignocaine alone (Level IB evidence). There is no evidence regarding the optimal time for non-surgical options.

Conclusions: There is a remarkable paucity of studies on EHT and few of those available provide high levels of evidence. Surgery may be superior to conservative treatment but there is no evidence regarding the optimal period of initiation of conservative management. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 May;38(5):453-6; discussion 456-7 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):650-5 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1971 Sep-Oct;14(5):331-40 - PubMed
    1. Dig Liver Dis. 2001 May;33(4):335-40 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Sep;46(9):1226-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources