Resolving conflicting comparative effectiveness research in critical care*
- PMID: 23080443
- PMCID: PMC3655079
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826536b7
Resolving conflicting comparative effectiveness research in critical care*
Conflict of interest statement
Comment on
-
Activated protein C and septic shock: a propensity-matched cohort study*.Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2974-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825fd6d9. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22932397
References
-
- Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Pinsky MR, et al. Outcomes research in critical care: results of the American Thoracic Society Critical Care Assembly Workshop on Outcomes Research. The Members of the Outcomes Research Workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(1):358–367. - PubMed
-
- Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–333. - PubMed
-
- Lindenauer PK, Rothberg MB, Nathanson BH, et al. Activated protein C and hospital mortality in septic shock: a propensity-matched analysis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4):1101–1107. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources