Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;31(2):99-104.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-012-0153-9. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

Dual-energy perfusion CT of non-diseased lung segments using dual-source CT: correlation with perfusion SPECT

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dual-energy perfusion CT of non-diseased lung segments using dual-source CT: correlation with perfusion SPECT

Yoshie Kunihiro et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the utility of dual-energy perfusion CT (DEpCT) of non-diseased lung segments, using dual-source CT, in comparison with perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Materials and methods: 28 patients (18 male and 10 female; mean age 63 years; age range 18-86 years) underwent DEpCT and SPECT within a 3-day interval. The presence and location of perfusion defects in each segment of the lungs were evaluated.

Results: Perfusion defects were noted in 7 of 361 segments (1.9%) by DEpCT and in 19 of 361 segments (5.3%) by perfusion SPECT. DEpCT was in good agreement with perfusion SPECT for 338 of 361 segments (93.6%). Intraobserver agreement was also good, ranging from 93.4 to 93.6% (κ = 0.64-0.75, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: For non-diseased lung segments, DEpCT correlated well with SPECT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):W325-30 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 1999 Dec;42(6):1033-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur Respir J. 2007 Jul;30(1):134-55 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):347-53 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):1093-6 - PubMed

Publication types