Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan-Feb;12(1):28-34.
doi: 10.1002/pst.1545. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

Sample size determination for clinical trials with co-primary outcomes: exponential event times

Affiliations

Sample size determination for clinical trials with co-primary outcomes: exponential event times

Toshimitsu Hamasaki et al. Pharm Stat. 2013 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Clinical trials with event-time outcomes as co-primary contrasts are common in many areas such as infectious disease, oncology, and cardiovascular disease. We discuss methods for calculating the sample size for randomized superiority clinical trials with two correlated time-to-event outcomes as co-primary contrasts when the time-to-event outcomes are exponentially distributed. The approach is simple and easily applied in practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between correlations for Clayton, positive stable, and Frank copulas with limited recruitment and censoring, where T0 = 2, λT1C1 = λT2C2 and ST1(T) = ST2(T).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Behavior of the sample size with common correlation ρT = ρC = ρ: sample size (equally sized groups: r 0.5) was calculated to detect the joint reduction in both of the time-to-event outcomes with the overall power of 1 − β = 0.80 at the significance level of α = 0.025, where T0 = 2 and T = 5, λT1C1 = 0.667 and ST1(5) = ST2(5) = 0.5 (C: Clayton copula, PS: positive stable copula, F: Frank copula).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Behavior of the empirical overall power for the log-rank test with common correlation ρT = ρC = ρ: sample size (equally sized groups: r = 0.5) was calculated to detect the joint reduction in both of the time-to-event outcomes with the overall power of 1 − β = 0.80 at the significance level of α = 0.025, where T0 = 2 and T = 5, λT1C1 = 0.667 and ST1(5) = ST2(5) = 0.5 A: Data were generated from the Clayton copula. B: Data were generated from the positive stable copula. C: Data were generated from the Clayton copula.

References

    1. Gong J, Pinheiro JC, DeMets DL. Estimating significance level and power comparisons for testing multiple endpoints in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 2000;21:323–329. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00049-0. - PubMed
    1. Offen W, Chuang-Stein C, Dmitrienko A, Littman G, Maca J, Meyerson L, Muirhead R, Stryszak P, Boddy A, Chen K, Copley-Merriman K, Dere W, Givens S, Hall D, Henry D, Jackson JD, Krishen A, Liu T, Ryder S, Sankoh AJ, Wang J, Yeh CH. Multiple co-primary endpoints: medical and statistical solutions. Drug Information Journal. 2007;41:31–46. DOI: 10.1177/009286150704100105.
    1. Chuang-Stein C, Stryszak P, Dmitrienko A, Offen W. Challenge of multiple co-primary endpoints: a new approach. Statistics in Medicine. 2007;26:1181–1192. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2604. - PubMed
    1. Hung HMJ, Wang SJ. Some controversial multiple testing problems in regulatory applications. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2009;19:1–11. DOI: 10.1080/10543400802541693. - PubMed
    1. Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC, Bretz F. Multiple Testing Problems in Pharmaceutical Statistics. Chapman & Hall; Boca Raton, FL: 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources