Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:698709.
doi: 10.1155/2012/698709. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

The Global Economic Cost of Osteoarthritis: How the UK Compares

Affiliations

The Global Economic Cost of Osteoarthritis: How the UK Compares

A Chen et al. Arthritis. 2012.

Abstract

Aims. To examine all relevant literature on the economic costs of osteoarthritis in the UK, and to compare such costs globally. Methods. A search of MEDLINE was performed. The search was expanded beyond peer-reviewed journals into publications by the department of health, national orthopaedic associations, national authorities and registries, and arthritis charities. Results. No UK studies were identified in the literature search. 3 European, 6 North American, and 2 Asian studies were reviewed. Significant variation in direct and indirect costs were seen in these studies. Costs for topical and oral NSAIDs were estimated to be £19.2 million and £25.65 million, respectively. Cost of hip and knee replacements was estimated to exceed £850 million, arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis was estimated to be £1.34 million. Indirect costs from OA caused a loss of economic production over £3.2 billion, £43 million was spent on community services and £215 million on social services for osteoarthritis. Conclusions. While estimates of economic costs can be made using information from non-published data, there remains a lack of original research looking at the direct or indirect costs of osteoarthritis in the UK. Differing methodology in calculating costs from overseas studies makes direct comparison with the UK difficult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

References

    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;81(9):646–656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. The Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436–1442. - PubMed
    1. Xie F, Thumboo J, Fong KY, et al. A study on indirect and intangible costs for patients with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore. Value in Health. 2008;11(1):84–90. - PubMed
    1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008;58(1):28–35. - PubMed
    1. Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis study. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1987;30(8):914–918. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources