Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching
- PMID: 23082390
Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the influence of preliminary phosphoric acid-etching on shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel and dentin of a self-adhering restorative composite and of a new self-etch adhesive used in combination with the proprietary flowable composite.
Methods: 100 human molars were selected. SBS was assessed on flat buccal enamel surfaces and mid-coronal dentin. Teeth from each group were divided into five subgroups (n=10): (1) FL: etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond FL/Premise flowable; (2) XTR: 2-step self-etch adhesive OptiBond XTR/Premise flowable; (3) eXTR: OptiBond XTR on etched substrates/Premise flowable; (4) VF: self-adhering flowable composite Vertise Flow; (5) eVF: Vertise Flow on etched substrates. Specimens were stressed in shear until failure. Failure modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test (P< 0.05).
Results: Dental substrate, material and between-factor interaction significantly influenced SBS (MPa). In FL group (16.83 +/- 2.93) significantly higher SBS to enamel than in the other groups (XTR 8.59 +/- 4.39; eXTR 7.04 +/- 3.63; VF 6.61 +/- 2,41; eVF 9.87 +/- 4.24) was measured. On dentin FL (8.15 +/- 3.88) performed similarly to XTR (10.60 +/- 5.0), eXTR (9.60 +/- 4.91) and eVF (5.48 +/- 4.94); VF recorded significantly lower SBS (2.94 +/- 2.79 MPa). Failure modes differed significantly among groups.
Similar articles
-
Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite.Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01689.x. Aust Dent J. 2012. PMID: 22624765
-
Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel.Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 26. Dent Mater. 2013. PMID: 23107191
-
Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.Am J Dent. 2003 Dec;16(6):414-20. Am J Dent. 2003. PMID: 15002958
-
The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1459-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7. Dent Mater. 2009. PMID: 19665220
-
Enamel and dentin bond strengths of a new self-etch adhesive system.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Dec;23(6):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00465.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011. PMID: 22142299
Cited by
-
Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.Odontology. 2018 Jan;106(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0294-5. Epub 2017 Feb 3. Odontology. 2018. PMID: 28160094
-
Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Composites: An In Vitro Study.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Oct 29;14(5):362-368. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_14_24. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024. PMID: 39677532 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Newly Introduced Bioactive Materials in Terms of Cavity Floor Adaptation: OCT Study.Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 12;14(24):7668. doi: 10.3390/ma14247668. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34947264 Free PMC article.
-
Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage?Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Mar 27;7:55-64. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S80462. eCollection 2015. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015. PMID: 25848318 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Shear Bond Strength of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers-Assisted Dentinal Adhesion of Self-Adhering Resin Composite: An Ex Vivo Study.Dent J (Basel). 2020 Jul 1;8(3):66. doi: 10.3390/dj8030066. Dent J (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32630313 Free PMC article.