Performance of the 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria
- PMID: 23083035
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01766.x
Performance of the 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria
Abstract
Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) needs early treatment to improve clinical outcome by reducing joint damage, radiographic progression and disability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria for its ability to classify RA patients, in their early stages, not exceeding 12 months of disease progression.
Methods: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were selected from August to December 2010, among those coming for their follow-up. The inclusion criteria were patients with not more than 12 months of disease progression at their first evaluation. Patients were selected from four rheumatology subspecialty clinics.
Results: Nine hundred and ninety-seven patients with a confirmed diagnosis of RA entered the study. The female-to-male ratio was 4.3/1.0. Mean age was 46.4 years. Mean disease progression at first visit was 6.3 months. The mean follow-up of their disease was 5.9 years. The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were fulfilled for 74% of patients. The ACR/EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) criteria were fulfilled for 69% of patients. Ten percent had involvement of 2-10 large joints, 29% 1-3 small joints, 25% 4-10 small joints and 32% more than 10 joints. Low rheumatoid factor (RF)/anticytoplasmic antibodies (ACPA) were discovered in 30%, high RF/ACPA in 37%; high erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein in 77%, and duration of 6 weeks or more in 92% of patients. There was no significant difference between men and women.
Conclusions: The 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria have good performance: sensitivity of 69% in early disease (first year), with the same sensitivity in both genders.
© 2012 The Authors International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases © 2012 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in Korean patients with undifferentiated arthritis.Scand J Rheumatol. 2012 May;41(3):192-5. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2012.654816. Epub 2012 Mar 9. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012. PMID: 22401568
-
Markers of progression to rheumatoid arthritis: discriminative value of the new ACR/EULAR rheumatoid arthritis criteria in a Portuguese population with early polyarthritis.Acta Reumatol Port. 2011 Oct-Dec;36(4):370-6. Acta Reumatol Port. 2011. PMID: 22472927
-
The clinical picture of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria: is this still the same disease?Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;64(2):389-93. doi: 10.1002/art.33348. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. PMID: 21918954
-
The new European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: how are they performing?Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 May;25(3):354-9. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835f6928. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23492742 Review.
-
The need to better classify and diagnose early and very early rheumatoid arthritis.J Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;39(2):212-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110967. Epub 2011 Dec 15. J Rheumatol. 2012. PMID: 22174195 Review.
Cited by
-
Rheumatology training and research in Iran.Rheumatol Int. 2019 Aug;39(8):1307-1319. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04325-5. Epub 2019 May 20. Rheumatol Int. 2019. PMID: 31111293
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials