Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Fall;28(4):327-38.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00414.x. Epub 2012 May 31.

The relationship between rural status, individual characteristics, and self-rated health in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Traci N Bethea  1 , Russell P Lopez, Yvette C Cozier, Laura F White, Michael D McClean
Affiliations

The relationship between rural status, individual characteristics, and self-rated health in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Traci N Bethea et al. J Rural Health. 2012 Fall.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine rural status and social factors as predictors of self-rated health in community-dwelling adults in the United States.

Methods: This study uses multinomial logistic and cumulative logistic models to evaluate the associations of interest in the 2006 U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a cross-sectional survey of 347,709 noninstitutionalized adults.

Findings: Self-rated health was poorer among rural residents, compared to urban residents (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.54, 1.90). However, underlying risk factors such as obesity, low income, and low educational attainment were found to vary by rural status and account for the observed increased risk (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.12). There was little evidence of effect modification by rural status, though the association between obesity and self-rated health was stronger among urban residents (OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 2.38, 2.64) than among rural residents (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 2.03, 2.34).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that differences in self-rated health by rural status were attributable to differential distributions of participant characteristics and not due to differential effects of those characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities (RTC: Rural), Rural Institute at the University of Montana. [Accessed October 7, 2009];Population distribution by urbanized areas and urban clusters. 2005 Available at: http://rtc.ruralinstitute.umt.edu/geography/docs/county3.pdf.
    1. US Census Bureau. [Accessed January 14, 2010];United States by urban/rural and inside/outside metropolitan area. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-_bo....
    1. US Census Bureau. Detailed Tables: P2. [Accessed January 14, 2010];Urban and Rural [6] - Universe: Total Population. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_n....
    1. Cromartie J, Bucholtz S. Defining the “rural” in rural America. Amber Waves. 2008;6:28–34.
    1. USDA. Measuring Rurality: Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. USDA Economic Research Service (ERS); [Accessed August 28, 2009]. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/RuralUrbCon/

Publication types

MeSH terms