Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan;34(1):90-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health

Stephanie W Edmonds et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: To describe the rationale and design of an NIH funded randomized controlled trial: the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effect that a direct mailing of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) results from bone density testing centers to patients will have on patients' knowledge, treatment and self-efficacy.

Methods: We will enroll approximately 7500 patients presenting for DXA at three study sites, the University of Iowa, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Georgia. We will randomize providers (and their respective patients) to either the intervention arm or usual care. Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a letter with their DXA results and an educational brochure, while those randomized to usual care will receive their DXA results according to standard practice. The seven discrete outcomes are changes from baseline to 12-weeks and/or 52-weeks post-DXA in: (1) guideline concordant pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapy; (2) knowledge of DXA results; (3) osteoporosis-specific knowledge; (4) general health-related quality of life; (5) satisfaction with bone-related health care, (6) patient activation; and, (7) osteoporosis-specific self-efficacy.

Conclusion: This trial will offer evidence of the impact of a novel approach-direct-to-patient mailing of test results-to improve patient activation in their bone health care. The results will inform clinical practice for the communication of DXA and other test results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interests: Dr. Saag has done consulting work and has received grant funding from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, and Novartis. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual Model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Randomization flowchart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sample DXA result letter
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sections from Bone Health Educational Brochure (Cover and Exercise Step)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Osteoporosis, F. [cited 2012 February 3];Prevalence Report. 2011 Available from: http://www.nof.org/advocacy/resources/prevalencereport.
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. [cited 2012 February 3];Screening for Osteoporosis: Recommendation Statement. 2011 Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf10/osteoporosis/osteo.... - PubMed
    1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1761–1767. - PubMed
    1. Cram P, et al. Failure to recognize and act on abnormal test results: the case of screening bone densitometry. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):90–97. - PubMed
    1. Fitt NS, et al. Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis. CMAJ. 2001;164(6):777–781. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types