Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013:930:53-65.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_3.

From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models

Affiliations
Review

From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models

Hao Zhu. Methods Mol Biol. 2013.

Abstract

Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) is the most frequently used modeling approach to explore the dependency of biological, toxicological, or other types of activities/properties of chemicals on their molecular features. In the past two decades, QSAR modeling has been used extensively in drug discovery process. However, the predictive models resulted from QSAR studies have limited use for chemical risk assessment, especially for animal and human toxicity evaluations, due to the low predictivity of new compounds. To develop enhanced toxicity models with independently validated external prediction power, novel modeling protocols were pursued by computational toxicologists based on rapidly increasing toxicity testing data in recent years. This chapter reviews the recent effort in our laboratory to incorporate the biological testing results as descriptors in the toxicity modeling process. This effort extended the concept of QSAR to quantitative structure in vitro-in vivo relationship (QSIIR). The QSIIR study examples provided in this chapter indicate that the QSIIR models that based on the hybrid (biological and chemical) descriptors are indeed superior to the conventional QSAR models that only based on chemical descriptors for several animal toxicity endpoints. We believe that the applications introduced in this review will be of interest and value to researchers working in the field of computational drug discovery and environmental chemical risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the prediction power of QSAR models using conventional and hybrid descriptors for carcinogenicity of external compounds
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ROC curves for conventional QSAR model (bold line) and different hybrid models for the same external compounds within acute toxicity modeling.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The identification of the baseline correlation between cytotoxicity (IC50) and various types of in vivo toxicity testing results. (A) Rat LD50. (B) Mouse LD50. (C) Rat LOAEL. (D) Rat NOAEL. C1, class 1; C2, class 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):711–715. - PubMed
    1. Inglese J, Auld DS, Jadhav A, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Yasgar A, Zheng W, Austin CP. Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(31):11473–11478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheeseman MA. Thresholds as a unifying theme in regulatory toxicology. Food Addit Contam. 2005;22(10):900–906. - PubMed
    1. Riley RJ, Kenna JG. Cellular models for ADMET predictions and evaluation of drug-drug interactions. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2004;7(1):86–99. - PubMed
    1. Dix DJ, Houck KA, Martin MT, Richard AM, Setzer RW, Kavlock RJ. The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol Sci. 2007;95(1):5–12. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources