Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 11:6:274.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00274. eCollection 2012.

Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes

Affiliations

Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes

Vivian Bohl et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Traditional theory of mind (ToM) accounts for social cognition have been at the basis of most studies in the social cognitive neurosciences. However, in recent years, the need to go beyond traditional ToM accounts for understanding real life social interactions has become all the more pressing. At the same time it remains unclear whether alternative accounts, such as interactionism, can yield a sufficient description and explanation of social interactions. We argue that instead of considering ToM and interactionism as mutually exclusive opponents, they should be integrated into a more comprehensive account of social cognition. We draw on dual process models of social cognition that contrast two different types of social cognitive processing. The first type (labeled Type 1) refers to processes that are fast, efficient, stimulus-driven, and relatively inflexible. The second type (labeled Type 2) refers to processes that are relatively slow, cognitively laborious, flexible, and may involve conscious control. We argue that while interactionism captures aspects of social cognition mostly related to Type 1 processes, ToM is more focused on those based on Type 2 processes. We suggest that real life social interactions are rarely based on either Type 1 or Type 2 processes alone. On the contrary, we propose that in most cases both types of processes are simultaneously involved and that social behavior may be sustained by the interplay between these two types of processes. Finally, we discuss how the new integrative framework can guide experimental research on social interaction.

Keywords: Type 1 processes; Type 2 processes; dual process theories; interactionism; social cognition; social interaction; theory of mind.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An integrative account of social cognition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adolphs R. (2009). The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 693–716 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allport A. (1987). Selection for action: some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action, in Perspectives on Perception and Action, eds Heuer H., Sanders A. F. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; ), 395–419
    1. Allport G. W. (1985). The historical background of social psychology, in The Handbook of Social Psychology, eds Lindzey G., Aronson E. (New York, NY: McGraw Hill; ), 1–46
    1. Amodio D. M., Frith C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 10.1038/nrn1884 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apperly I. (2011). Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of “Theory of Mind.” Hove, New York: Psychology Press

LinkOut - more resources