Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jun;22(2):155-62.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000455. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

Coverage of mental health and substance misuse topics in the Cochrane review system

Affiliations
Review

Coverage of mental health and substance misuse topics in the Cochrane review system

S Green-Hennessy. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Aims. To assess the breadth of mental and substance coverage in the Cochrane review system. Methods. All mental health and substance entries were identified from the 2005 to April 2012 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Results. A total of 1019 entries focused on mental health or substance misuse, with 698 (68.5%) being completed reviews. One out of every five entries focused on serious mental illness/psychosis. Systematic reviews addressing unipolar depression, dementia and certain substance disorders also appeared well-represented. In contrast, a number of impairing disorders frequently seen in practice received less attention, with bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and autism spectrum disorders each accounting for less than 2% of the entries. The majority of interventions reviewed involved medication (57.1%), although this was not the case for a number of childhood-onset disorders. Some diagnostic areas (sleep, anxiety, mood and substance) were addressed by multiple Cochrane review groups (CRGs). Conclusions. The Cochrane Collaboration is well poised to be a strong guiding influence to those seeking to employ evidence-based mental health care. Broadening its diagnostic coverage and diversifying types of intervention reviewed would probably further maximize its impact. A more centralized and directed approach of prioritizing topics could help ensure more comprehensive coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmad N, Boutron I, Deschartres A, Durieux P, Ravaud P (2010). Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic review to public health practice and policy: a systematic review. Trials 11, 20–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso J, Petukhova M, Vilagut G, Chatterji S, Heeringa S, Üstün TB, Alhamzawi AO, Viana MC, Angermeyer M, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, Florescu S, Gureje O, Haro JM, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Karam EG, Kovess V, Levinson D, Medina-Mora ME, Nakamura Y, Ormel J, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Scott KM, Tsang A, Williams DR, Kessler RC (2011). Days out of role due to common physical and mental conditions: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Molecular Psychiatry 16, 1234–1246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Revised edn. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.
    1. Armstrong R, Pettman T, Burford B, Doyle J, Waters E (2012). Cochrane update: tracking and understanding the utility of Cochrane reviews for public health decision making. Journal of Public Health 34, 309–313. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong R, Waters E, Crockett B, Keleher H (2007). The nature of evidence resources and knowledge translation for health promotion practitioners. Health Promotion International 22, 254–260. - PubMed