Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling
- PMID: 23090515
- PMCID: PMC3711271
- DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826b9fef
Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling
Abstract
Objective: To identify risk factors for endometrial cancer after benign results of endometrial biopsy or dilation and curettage (D&C).
Methods: Nested case-control study from Rochester Epidemiology Project data. Among 370 Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents who received an endometrial cancer diagnosis between 1970 and 2008, we identified 90 patients (24.5%) who had previous benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results (no atypical hyperplasia). We compared them with 172 matched control group participants who had benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results without subsequent endometrial cancer.
Results: Using a multivariable conditional logistic regression model, we found that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use was protective (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% CI [CI] 0.08-0.45; P<.001), and personal history of colorectal cancer (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.02-19.31; P<.05), endometrial polyp (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.40-12.17; P=.01), and morbid obesity (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.18-9.78; P<.03) were independently associated with subsequent endometrial cancer. Compared with the presence of no risk factor, presence of one and two or more risk factors increased the risk of endometrial cancer by 8.12 (95% CI 3.08-21.44) and 17.87 (95% CI 5.57-57.39) times, respectively. Assuming a 2.6% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer, ORs of 8.12 and 17.87 for one and two or more of the four aforementioned risk factors confer a lifetime risk of approximately 18% and 32%, respectively.
Conclusion: One fourth of patients with endometrial cancer had previous benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results. Personal history of colorectal cancer, presence of endometrial polyps, and morbid obesity are the strongest risk factors for having endometrial cancer after a benign endometrial biopsy or D&C result, and OCP use is the strongest protective factor.
Level of evidence: II.
Figures
Comment in
-
Missed opportunities for primary endometrial cancer prevention: how to optimize early identification and treatment of high-risk women.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):989-91. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827237ef. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 23090512 No abstract available.
-
Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):380-381. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280a155. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23344296 No abstract available.
-
Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):381-382. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280a16a. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23344297 No abstract available.
-
In reply: risk factors for developing endometrial cancer.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):382. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280a338. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23344298 No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10–29. Epub 2012 Jan 4. - PubMed
-
- Weiss NS, Szekely DR, Austin DF. Increasing incidence of endometrial cancer in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1976 Jun 3;294(23):1259–62. - PubMed
-
- Havrilesky LJ, Maxwell GL, Myers ER. Cost-effectiveness analysis of annual screening strategies for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):640.e1–8. Epub 2009 Apr 19. - PubMed
-
- Kwon JS, Lu KH. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endometrial cancer prevention strategies for obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;112(1):56–63. - PubMed
-
- Leslie KK, Thiel KW, Yang S. Endometrial cancer: potential treatment and prevention with progestin-containing intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 2):419–20. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
