Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;42(9):606-13.
doi: 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.9.606. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

A comparison of cornell and sokolow-lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in korean patients

Affiliations

A comparison of cornell and sokolow-lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in korean patients

Jin Kyu Park et al. Korean Circ J. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cost-effective and useful method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a large-scale study or in clinical practice. Among ECG criteria, the Cornell product (Cor P) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were adopted by the European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines but have different performances among races. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of two voltage criteria in Korean patients.

Subjects and methods: Electrocardiography and echocardiographic LV mass of 332 (159 male, 173 female) consecutive patients were analyzed. Cornell voltage criteria and the Cor P were compared with Sokolow-Lyon voltage (Sok V) and the Sokolow-Lyon product (Sok P). The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the LVH diagnosis. The sensitivities and revised cut-off values were derived at specificity levels of 90, 95, and 100%.

Results: The Cornell-based criteria generally showed better performance than that of the Sok V criteria and Sok P in the area under the ROC curve analysis. The revised cut-off values for the Cornell voltage criteria (20 and 16 mm for males and females, respectively) showed an improved sensitivity (19.7 and 30.3% for males and females, respectively), with a high specificity of 95%.

Conclusion: The Cornell-based criteria had better performance than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in both Korean men and women. However, revised cut-off values are needed to improve accuracy.

Keywords: Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Hypertrophy, left ventricular; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with four electrocardiogram criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A: the ROC curve for defining LVH using left ventricular mass (LVM)/body surface area (BSA) ≥116 g/m2 in males. B: LVM/BSA ≥96 g/m2 in females. C: LVM/height2.7 ≥49 g/m2.7 in males. D: LVM/height2.7 ≥45 g/m2.7 in females. *p<0.05, p<0.01. blue: Sok V, brown: Sok P, orange: Cor V and green: Cor P. Sok V: Sokolow-Lyon voltage, Cor V: Cornell voltage, Sok P: Sokolow-Lyon product, Cor P: Cornell product, CI: confidence interval, AUC: area under the curves.

References

    1. Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JA, et al. The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2148–2155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundström J, Lind L, Arnlöv J, Zethelius B, Andrén B, Lithell HO, et al. Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnoses of left ventricular hypertrophy predict mortality independently of each other in a population of elderly men. Circulation. 2001;103:2346–2351. - PubMed
    1. Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:992–1002. - PubMed
    1. Molloy TJ, Okin PM, Devereux RB, Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1180–1186. - PubMed
    1. Truong QA, Ptaszek LM, Charipar EM, et al. Performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy as compared with cardiac computed tomography: from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography Trial. J Hypertens. 2010;28:1959–1967. - PMC - PubMed