Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:672403.
doi: 10.1155/2012/672403. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Normative data for bone mass in healthy term infants from birth to 1 year of age

Affiliations

Normative data for bone mass in healthy term infants from birth to 1 year of age

Sina Gallo et al. J Osteoporos. 2012.

Abstract

For over 2 decades, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the gold standard for estimating bone mineral density (BMD) and facture risk in adults. More recently DXA has been used to evaluate BMD in pediatrics. However, BMD is usually assessed against reference data for which none currently exists in infancy. A prospective study was conducted to assess bone mass of term infants (37 to 42 weeks of gestation), weight appropriate for gestational age, and born to healthy mothers. The group consisted of 33 boys and 26 girls recruited from the Winnipeg Health Sciences Center (Manitoba, Canada). Whole body (WB) as well as regional sites of the lumbar spine (LS 1-4) and femur was measured using DXA (QDR 4500A, Hologic Inc.) providing bone mineral content (BMC) for all sites and BMD for spine. During the year, WB BMC increased by 200% (76.0 ± 14.2 versus 227.0 ± 29.7 g), spine BMC by 130% (2.35 ± 0.42 versus 5.37 ± 1.02 g), and femur BMC by 190% (2.94 ± 0.54 versus 8.50 ± 1.84 g). Spine BMD increased by 14% (0.266 ± 0.044 versus 0.304 ± 0.044 g/cm(2)) during the year. This data, representing the accretion of bone mass during the first year of life, is based on a representative sample of infants and will aid in the interpretation of diagnostic DXA scans by researchers and health professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spine BMD-for-age reference curve for infants, birth to 12 mo.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mora S, Bachrach L, Gilsanz V. Noninvasive techniques for bone mass measurement. In: Glorieux F, Pettifor J, Juppner H, editors. Pediatric Bone: Biology and Diseases. San Diego, Calif, USA: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 303–324.
    1. Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, Kendler DL, Leib ES, Lewiecki EM, Petak SM. Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2006;9(1):4–14. - PubMed
    1. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1992;7(2):137–145. - PubMed
    1. Ott SM, O’Hanlan M, Lipkin EW, Newell-Morris L. Evaluation of vertebral volumetric versus areal bone mineral density during growth. Bone. 1997;20(6):553–556. - PubMed
    1. Sabin MA, Blake GM, MacLaughlin-Black SM, Fogelman I. The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcified Tissue International. 1995;56(3):210–214. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources