Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep;18(3):249-57.
doi: 10.3350/cmh.2012.18.3.249. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Drug-induced liver injury: present and future

Affiliations
Review

Drug-induced liver injury: present and future

Ki Tae Suk et al. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Liver injury due to prescription and nonprescription medications is a growing medical, scientific, and public health problem. Worldwide, the estimated annual incidence rate of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is 13.9-24.0 per 100,000 inhabitants. DILI is one of the leading causes of acute liver failure in the US. In Korea, the annual extrapolated incidence of cases hospitalized at university hospital is 12/100,000 persons/year. Most cases of DILI are the result of idiosyncratic metabolic responses or unexpected reactions to medication. There is marked geographic variation in relevant agents; antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and psychotropic drugs are the most common offending agents in the West, whereas in Asia, 'herbs' and 'health foods or dietary supplements' are more common. Different medical circumstances also cause discrepancy in definition and classification of DILI between West and Asia. In the concern of causality assessment, the application of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale frequently undercounts the cases caused by 'herbs' due to a lack of previous information and incompatible time criteria. Therefore, a more objective and reproducible tool that could be used for the diagnosis of DILI caused by 'herbs' is needed in Asia. In addition, a reporting system similar to the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) in the US should be established as soon as possible in Asia.

Keywords: Asia; Drug-Induced Liver Injury; Herbal Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of drug-induced liver injury according to age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three-step mechanism of drug-induced liver injury.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Classification of patients. (A) Types of drug induced liver injury by etiology. (B) Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method score by etiology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vuppalanchi R, Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N. Etiology of new-onset jaundice: how often is it caused by idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury in the United States? Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:558–562. - PubMed
    1. Devarbhavi H, Dierkhising R, Kremers WK, Sandeep MS, Karanth D, Adarsh CK. Single-center experience with drug-induced liver injury from India: causes, outcome, prognosis, and predictors of mortality. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2396–2404. - PubMed
    1. Fontana RJ, Watkins PB, Bonkovsky HL, Chalasani N, Davern T, Serrano J, et al. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct. Drug Saf. 2009;32:55–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norris W, Paredes AH, Lewis JH. Drug-induced liver injury in 2007. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24:287–297. - PubMed
    1. Au JS, Navarro VJ, Rossi S. Review article: Drug-induced liver injury-its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic tools. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:11–20. - PubMed

MeSH terms