CUA Annual Meeting Abstracts addition
- PMID: 23093531
- PMCID: PMC3433537
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.12208
CUA Annual Meeting Abstracts addition
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Foley catheters are assumed to drain the bladder to completion. We have previously shown that dependent loops along the drainage tubing create air-locks, which obstruct antegrade urine flow and result in un-drained residual bladder urine. We hypothesized that drainage characteristics of Foley catheters remain poorly understood by urologists and general surgeons. We conducted a nationwide survey of general surgery and urology training program faculty and residents, to assess perceptions of Foley catheter drainage. We designed a novel catheter drainage tube/bag that eliminates air-locks.
Methods: An anonymous illustrated questionnaire assessing Foley catheter use patterns and perception was sent to general surgery and urology residency programs (N=108) nationwide. A modified catheter drainage tube/bag unit was designed and tested. An ex vivo catheterized bladder model was designed to measure and compare urine drainage rates with the standard drainage system, versus with our novel design.
Results: A total of 307 responses were collected from residents (55%) and faculty (45%); responses were similar among both groups (p<0.05). The majority reported that at their centers Foley catheter drainage tubes are generally positioned with a dependent loop (94.1%), and, that positioning with a dependent loop, versus without (78.1%) promoted optimal drainage. Antegrade drainage does not occur with a traditional drainage system when a >5.5 inch dependent loop in place. With our proposed design, which eliminates dependent loops, the bladder model emptied to completion consistently.
Conclusions: Traditional Foley catheter drainage systems, as commonly used, evacuate the bladder sub- optimally. More reliable and complete bladder drainage may decrease the incidence of catheter related UTI. The novel modified Foley catheter drainage tube/bag design presented here eliminates dependent loops, to optimize antegrade drainage.
Erratum for
-
Guidelines for the management of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass.Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Aug;5(4):241-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11135. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011. PMID: 21801680 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
2012 CUA Abstracts.Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Jun;6(3 Suppl 1):S3-S103. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012. PMID: 22709920 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Traditional Foley drainage systems--do they drain the bladder?J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):203-7; discussion 207. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.101. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17162043 Clinical Trial.
-
Foley drainage tubing configuration affects bladder pressure: a bench model study.Urol Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):33-7. Urol Nurs. 2014. PMID: 24716379
-
Do Foley Catheters Adequately Drain the Bladder? Evidence from CT Imaging Studies.Int Braz J Urol. 2015 May-Jun;41(3):552-5. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0392. Int Braz J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26200550 Free PMC article.
-
Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: part 2: staff education, monitoring, and care techniques.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;36(2):137-54. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000347655.56851.04. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19287262 Review.
-
Foley versus intermittent self-catheterization after transvaginal sling surgery: which works best?Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.004. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15245935 Review.
References
-
- Kapoor A, Morris T, Rebello R. Guidelines for the management of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5:241–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.11135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources