Comparison of self-obtained penile-meatal swabs to urine for the detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis
- PMID: 23093735
- PMCID: PMC3671873
- DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050686
Comparison of self-obtained penile-meatal swabs to urine for the detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis
Erratum in
- Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Sep;89(6):534
Abstract
Background: Self-obtained penile-meatal swabs and urine specimens have been used for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) for outreach screening in men.
Objective: To compare the sensitivity of self-collected male penile-meatal swabs and urine for the detection of CT, NG and TV.
Methods: Matching penile-meatal swabs and urines were collected at home after recruitment to the study; via the internet programme, http://www.iwantthekit.org. The instructions directed the participant to place the tip of a Copan flocked swab at the meatal opening of the urethra to collect the penile-meatal sample. Two ml of urine was collected after the swab onto a Copan sponge-on-a-shaft collection device. Both swab and urine were placed into individual Aptima transport media tubes and mailed to the laboratory for testing. All specimens were tested for CT and NG using the GenProbe Aptima Combo2 Assay and for TV using GenProbe Aptima Analyte Specific Reagents with TV oligonucleotides.
Results: Of 634 men, 86 (13.6%) were positive for CT, 9 (1.4%) were positive for NG and 56 (9.3%) positive for TV. For CT, swab sensitivity was 81/86 (94.2%), and urine sensitivity was 66/86 (76.7%). For NG, swab sensitivity was 9/9 (100%) and urine sensitivity was 8/9 (88.9%). For TV, swab sensitivity was 45/56 (80.4%) and urine sensitivity was 22/56 (39.3%).
Conclusions: Self-obtained penile-meatal swabs provided for the detection of more CT, NG and TV, than urine specimens.
Keywords: Chlamydia Trachomatis; Diagnosis; Neisseria Gonorrhoea; Trichomonas.
Similar articles
-
Performance of self-collected penile-meatal swabs compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium by nucleic acid amplification assays.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;86(2):131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27497595 Free PMC article.
-
Can mailed swab samples be dry-shipped for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by nucleic acid amplification tests?Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;73(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.008. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22578934 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of self-collected glans and rectal swabs from men who have sex with men for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of nucleic acid amplification tests.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1657-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02269-08. Epub 2009 Apr 15. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19369445 Free PMC article.
-
Self-collected glans/meatal 'dry' swab specimen and NAAT technology detects Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae - implications for public policy changes.Int J STD AIDS. 2017 Sep;28(10):985-990. doi: 10.1177/0956462416684693. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Int J STD AIDS. 2017. PMID: 28632470
-
Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis: A Meta-Analysis.Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):172-179. doi: 10.1370/afm.2942. Ann Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 36973065 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
High burden of untreated syphilis, drug resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and other sexually transmitted infections in men with urethral discharge syndrome in Kampala, Uganda.BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 7;22(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07431-1. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35525934 Free PMC article.
-
An Isothermal, Multiplex Amplification Assay for Detection and Genotyping of Human Papillomaviruses in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.J Mol Diagn. 2020 Mar;22(3):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 22. J Mol Diagn. 2020. PMID: 31978559 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Men Using Self-Collected Swabs: A Systematic Review.Sex Transm Dis. 2018 May;45(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000739. Sex Transm Dis. 2018. PMID: 29465701 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States.AIDS Behav. 2023 Apr;27(4):1091-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03846-8. Epub 2022 Sep 12. AIDS Behav. 2023. PMID: 36094639 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging the gap between development of point-of-care nucleic acid testing and patient care for sexually transmitted infections.Lab Chip. 2022 Feb 1;22(3):476-511. doi: 10.1039/d1lc00665g. Lab Chip. 2022. PMID: 35048928 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Gift TL, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American Youth, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:11–19. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2010. US Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA: 2011. pp. 1–155. 2010. CDC.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually transmitted disease treatment guidelines 2010. MMWR Dec 17 2010. 2010;59:1–110. http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2010. CDC. - PubMed
-
- Gaydos CA, Ferrero DV, Papp J. Laboratory aspects of screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis in the new millennium. Sex Tansmit Dis. 2008;35(supple):S45–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources