Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jan;38(1):137-42.
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.731550. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Associations of VEGF/VEGF-receptor and HGF/c-Met promoter polymorphisms with progression/regression of retinopathy of prematurity

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Associations of VEGF/VEGF-receptor and HGF/c-Met promoter polymorphisms with progression/regression of retinopathy of prematurity

Mahmut Kaya et al. Curr Eye Res. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect(s) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and HGF receptor (c-Met) polymorphisms on progression/regression of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants.

Materials and methods: This study comprised both a prospective analysis and a clinically relevant laboratory investigation. Enrolled were 123 Turkish preterm infants--gestational age (GA), ≤34 weeks; birth weight (BW), ≤1500 g--from a single tertiary care center. Infants were grouped as those who had undergone laser therapy (Group 1, n = 42), those with spontaneously regressed ROP (Group 2, n = 50), and those with no ROP (controls) (Group 3, n = 31). VEGF (-634) C and VEGF (-460) C polymorphisms were analyzed using the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (PCR-RFLP) technique. VEGFR-2, HGF, and c-Met gene promoter polymorphisms were determined by direct sequencing.

Results: Mean GAs and BWs of infants in Groups 1 and 2 were statistically significantly lower than those of Group 3 (p = 0.001). Frequencies of VEGF (-634) C and VEGF (-460) C polymorphisms were similar for all groups. We found a +32G→A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region of the VEGFR-2 gene. HGF and c-Met gene promoter polymorphisms were not found in any group.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that there is no association between the carrier states of gene promoter polymorphisms VEGF (-634) C, VEGF (-460) C, and VEGFR-2, and progression or spontaneous regression of ROP in preterm infants. The absence of HGF and c-Met polymorphisms in our study groups suggests that polymorphisms in the minimal promoters of these genes are not involved in the pathogenesis of ROP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources