Detection of fetal major structural anomalies at the 11-14 ultrasound scan in an unselected population
- PMID: 23094773
Detection of fetal major structural anomalies at the 11-14 ultrasound scan in an unselected population
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of the 11-14 week scan in detecting fetuses with structural anomalies.
Study design and methods: Prospective interventional study in an unselected population of pregnant women in a 5-year period (2003-2008) in a single ultrasound unit. 8889 fetuses with median CRL 65mm (45-84mm) were examined. Continuing pregnancies were rescanned at 20-22 weeks. Actual structural anomalies among newborns from the studied group were obtained from our computerized database.
Results: The median maternal age was 30 years (14-50 years). The incidence of anomalies was 16.08 per 1000 (143/8889). Of these, 99 of the 143 were detected with prenatal sonography. 46.9% (67/143) of all anomalies were detected at the 11-14 week scan. Later in pregnancy, another 22.3% (32/143) of structural anomalies were detected.
Conclusions: 67.7% of all antenatally detected malformations by ultrasound were recognized in the 11 14 week scan. Obviously, the second trimester scan cannot be abandoned, as it provides effective detection of other anomalies.
Similar articles
-
Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11-14-week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(8):912-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340500448438. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 16862467
-
Implications of a first trimester Down syndrome screening program on timing of malformation detection.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jul;90(7):728-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01156.x. Epub 2011 May 26. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011. PMID: 21504413
-
Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):393-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.032. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16458635
-
[Examination of fetal developmental abnormalities by routine transvaginal ultrasonic screening in the 12th week of pregnancy].Orv Hetil. 1994 Jul 10;135(28):1521-6. Orv Hetil. 1994. PMID: 8058293 Review. Hungarian.
-
[Prenatal diagnosis of developmental congenital malformations--the limitations of ultrasound scanning].Harefuah. 2003 Apr;142(4):287-92, 317, 316. Harefuah. 2003. PMID: 12754880 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Fetal heart assessment in the first trimester of pregnancy: influence of crown-rump length and maternal body mass index.Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Oct-Dec;28(4):477-81. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130078. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013. PMID: 24598952 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD014715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38721874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(22):1-250. doi: 10.3310/NLTP7102. Health Technol Assess. 2025. PMID: 40455571 Free PMC article.
-
First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):11-25. doi: 10.1002/uog.23740. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34369613 Free PMC article.
-
The Performance of First-Trimester Anatomy Scan: A Decision Analysis.Am J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;33(10):957-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579652. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Am J Perinatol. 2016. PMID: 27105290 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical