A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis
- PMID: 23095627
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827324ba
A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the outcome after Hartmann's procedure (HP) versus primary anastomosis (PA) with diverting ileostomy for perforated left-sided diverticulitis.
Background: The surgical management of left-sided colonic perforation with purulent or fecal peritonitis remains controversial. PA with ileostomy seems to be superior to HP; however, results in the literature are affected by a significant selection bias. No randomized clinical trial has yet compared the 2 procedures.
Methods: Sixty-two patients with acute left-sided colonic perforation (Hinchey III and IV) from 4 centers were randomized to HP (n = 30) and to PA (with diverting ileostomy, n = 32), with a planned stoma reversal operation after 3 months in both groups. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary end point was the overall complication rate. The study was discontinued following an interim analysis that found significant differences of relevant secondary end points as well as a decreasing accrual rate (NCT01233713).
Results: Patient demographics were equally distributed in both groups (Hinchey III: 76% vs 75% and Hinchey IV: 24% vs 25%, for HP vs PA, respectively). The overall complication rate for both resection and stoma reversal operations was comparable (80% vs 84%, P = 0.813). Although the outcome after the initial colon resection did not show any significant differences (mortality 13% vs 9% and morbidity 67% vs 75% in HP vs PA), the stoma reversal rate after PA with diverting ileostomy was higher (90% vs 57%, P = 0.005) and serious complications (Grades IIIb-IV: 0% vs 20%, P = 0.046), operating time (73 minutes vs 183 minutes, P < 0.001), hospital stay (6 days vs 9 days, P = 0.016), and lower in-hospital costs (US $16,717 vs US $24,014) were significantly reduced in the PA group.
Conclusions: This is the first randomized clinical trial favoring PA with diverting ileostomy over HP in patients with perforated diverticulitis.
Comment in
-
Primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: an impracticable trial.Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):e116-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000536. Ann Surg. 2015. PMID: 24441815 No abstract available.
-
What is the preferred surgery for perforated left-sided diverticulitis?J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Mar;218(3):495-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.011. J Am Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 24559959 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):599-610. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8. Epub 2019 Jun 6. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31178342 Clinical Trial.
-
Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis due to Perforated Diverticulitis: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial (DIVERTI).J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22. J Am Coll Surg. 2017. PMID: 28943323 Clinical Trial.
-
Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Aug;35(8):1371-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8. Epub 2020 Jun 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 32504331 Free PMC article.
-
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: Three-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.Int J Surg. 2022 Feb;98:106221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106221. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35026462 Clinical Trial.
-
Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann's procedure or resection with primary anastomosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;22(10):743-753. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1819-9. Epub 2018 Jul 11. Tech Coloproctol. 2018. PMID: 29995173
Cited by
-
Glove and instrument changing to prevent bacterial contamination in infected wound debridement and closure procedures: A prospective observational study.Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):664-669. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13568. Epub 2021 May 6. Int Wound J. 2021. PMID: 33955150 Free PMC article.
-
Management of diverticular disease.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;12(11):629-38. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.115. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 26170219 Review.
-
Trends in the surgical management of diverticulitis.Ann Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):25-30. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25608492 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Freely Perforated Diverticulitis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Oct;62(10):1153-1156. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001457. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 31490823 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1173-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04490-9. Epub 2019 Dec 16. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020. PMID: 31845141
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous