The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients
- PMID: 23096600
- PMCID: PMC3749735
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267efc5
The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients
Abstract
Background: The authors hypothesized that, for obese patients, delayed abdominal-based free flap (rather than implant-based and immediate) breast reconstruction would result in fewer overall complications and reconstruction losses.
Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed consecutive implant- and abdominal-based free flap breast reconstructions performed in obese patients between 2005 and 2010 by utilizing the World Health Organization obesity classifications: class I, 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2; class II, 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2; and class III, ≥40 kg/m2. Primary outcome measures included flap failures and overall complications. Logistic regression analysis identified associations among patient, defect, and reconstructive characteristics and surgical outcomes.
Results: The analysis included 990 breast reconstructions (548 flaps versus 442 implants) in 700 patients. Mean follow-up was 17 months. Age, smoking, medical illness, and body mass index greater than 37 predicted overall complications on regression analysis. Implants demonstrated a higher failure rate (15.8 percent) than flaps (1.5 percent). Although failure rates were similar for immediate and delayed flap reconstructions overall (1.3 versus 1.9 percent) and among obesity classifications, there was a trend toward more implant failures in immediate rather than delayed reconstructions (16.8 versus 5.3 percent). Differences between immediate implant versus flap reconstruction failure rates were highest among more obese patients [class II (24.7 versus 1.3 percent) and class III (25.4 versus 0 percent) compared with class I (11.7 versus 1.4 percent)].
Conclusions: Obese patients (particularly class II and III) experience higher failure rates with implant-based breast reconstruction, particularly immediate reconstruction. Free flap techniques or delayed implant reconstruction may be warranted in this population.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, II.
Similar articles
-
Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):681e-692e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828e2159. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23629107
-
Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Apr;105(5):1640-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200004050-00007. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. PMID: 10809092
-
Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):1954-60; discussion 1961-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00017. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. PMID: 11743383
-
Bostwick Autoderm and Implant Technique: Improved Outcomes for Obese Patients in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):187e-195e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007515. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33165289
-
Combining Abdominal Flaps and Implants in the Breast Reconstruction Patient: A Systematic and Retrospective Review of Complications and Outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):495e-503e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005373. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30589827
Cited by
-
Accuracy of a multidisciplinary team-led discussion in predicting postmastectomy radiotherapy.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Apr;97(3):198-203. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925061153. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015. PMID: 26263804 Free PMC article.
-
Microsurgical refinements with the use of internal mammary (IM) perforators as recipient vessels in transverse upper gracilis (TUG) autologous breast reconstruction.Gland Surg. 2017 Aug;6(4):375-379. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.05.04. Gland Surg. 2017. PMID: 28861378 Free PMC article.
-
The Partner Perspective on Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1324-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03286-2. Epub 2023 Feb 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36820865 Free PMC article.
-
Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy-A deeper insight considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 5;9:903734. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903734. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36132203 Free PMC article.
-
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Morbidly Obese Patients.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4261. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004261. eCollection 2022 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35433156 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:886–893. - PubMed
-
- Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, et al. Effect of Obesity on Flap and Donor-Site Complications in Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1640–1649. - PubMed
-
- Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1954–1960. - PubMed
-
- Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pocakj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:447–457. - PubMed
-
- Spear SL, Ducic ID, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:788–795. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials