Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):95S-103S.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262e1a1.

Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction

C Andrew Salzberg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):669

Abstract

Background: Direct-to-implant reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix has expanded the surgeon's repertoire and given the patient an opportunity to have a one-stage option after skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy. The technique produces total implant coverage without the need for expansion, repeated operations, and delayed return of normal body image.

Methods: In patients with adequate, good-quality mastectomy skin, a subpectoral pocket is created after mastectomy. The inferomedial pectoralis major muscle is elevated for implant placement. The acellular dermal matrix is sutured to the released inferior pole of the pectoralis muscle along its entire lower course and to the lateral mammary fold. The implant is introduced beneath the muscle-matrix layer, and the matrix is sutured to the inframammary fold at its desired position. Two suction drains are placed, one subpectorally and the other subcutaneously, through separate stab incisions, followed by skin closure.

Results: Over a 10-year period, the author has performed this technique in 439 patients (790 breasts). Consistently low complication rates and good aesthetic outcomes have been obtained. Major complications, including implant loss (1.6 percent), skin necrosis requiring reoperation (1.3 percent), infection (1.1 percent), hematoma (0.6 percent), seroma (0.5 percent), and capsular contracture (0.5 percent), have remained at an incidence of less than 2 percent.

Conclusions: The author's 10-year results using acellular dermal matrix in direct-to-implant breast reconstructions demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedure, as well as its long-term safety and aesthetic benefits. Its success, however, relies on appropriate patient selection and specific intraoperative technique principles.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Halstead W. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June 1889 to January 1894. Johns Hopkins Bull. 1894:4:297.
    1. Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172:17–20.
    1. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: Technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–150.
    1. Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Anthony JP, Hwang ES, Do H. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:462–466.
    1. Ashikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR, Salzberg CA. Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer 2008;15:185–191.