Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study
- PMID: 23097311
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.21876
Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) on subcutaneous (SC) abatacept immunogenicity, and to assess safety and efficacy.
Methods: This phase III, open-label study had a 4-month short-term (ST) period and an ongoing long-term extension (LTE) period. Rheumatoid arthritis patients were stratified to receive SC abatacept (125 mg/week) with (combination) or without MTX (monotherapy), with no intravenous loading dose; patients receiving monotherapy could add MTX in the LTE period. Immunogenicity (percentage of anti-abatacept antibody-positive patients) was assessed. ST and LTE period data are reported, including efficacy through LTE month 14 and safety through LTE month 20.
Results: Ninety-six of 100 enrolled patients completed the ST period; 3.9% (combination) and 4.1% of patients (monotherapy) developed transient immunogenicity, and no patients were antibody positive at month 4. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 3.9% (combination) and 6.1% of patients (monotherapy); 5.9% (combination) and 8.2% of patients (monotherapy) experienced SC injection reactions, and all were mild in intensity. Mean 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) changes were -1.67 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -2.06, -1.28; combination) and -1.94 (95% CI -2.46, -1.42; monotherapy) at month 4. Ninety patients entered and were treated in the LTE period; 83.3% (75 of 90) remained ongoing at month 24. One LTE-treated patient (1.1%) developed immunogenicity, 14.4% of patients experienced SAEs, and no SC injection reactions were reported. For patients entering the LTE period, mean DAS28 changes from baseline were -1.84 (95% CI -2.23, -1.34; combination) and -2.86 (95% CI -3.46, -2.27; monotherapy) at month 18.
Conclusion: SC abatacept did not elicit immunogenicity associated with loss of safety or efficacy, either with or without MTX.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00547521.
Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Similar articles
-
Subcutaneous abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: longterm data from the ACQUIRE trial.J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):629-39. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130112. Epub 2014 Mar 1. J Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24584926 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of abatacept administered subcutaneously or intravenously in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a Phase II/III, randomized study.Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;24(6):885-91. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.881954. Epub 2014 Apr 7. Mod Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24708204 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with subcutaneous abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are methotrexate inadequate responders.Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;25(5):665-71. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1012786. Mod Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 25698370
-
Safety profile of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: a review.Clin Ther. 2010 Oct;32(11):1855-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.10.011. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 21095481 Review.
-
Safety of T-cell co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5 Suppl 46):S46-56. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007. PMID: 17977488 Review.
Cited by
-
[Pathogenic cells of rheumatic inflammation as the target of modern therapies].Z Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;74(1):8-13. doi: 10.1007/s00393-014-1437-5. Z Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 25676124 Review. German.
-
[Biologics in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis : A comparison of mono- and combination therapy with synthetic DMARDs].Z Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;78(7):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s00393-019-0645-4. Z Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 31087133 Review. German.
-
Non-tumor necrosis factor-based biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: present, future, and insights into pathogenesis.Biologics. 2014;8:1-12. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S35475. Epub 2013 Dec 9. Biologics. 2014. PMID: 24353404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31339961 Free PMC article.
-
[Recommendations for use of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].Z Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;73(10):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s00393-014-1373-4. Z Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24903655 German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical